Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mishi
Thank goodness for people like Natalie, Useless Warrior, and Mr Yum who are willing to call bullshit.
Like Cleo, I draw a line between sites that present chicks as tipsy and uninhibited vs. drunk out of their minds (or passed out) and oblivious. Unfortunately, it seems many (if not most) submitters don't draw that line, so I've more or less banned that content.
Yes, porn is fantasy. But the only way we can even begin to defend our industry is if we choose to ensure that fantasy involves consenting adults. Period.
Fido, I appreciate your post and I think I understand what you're coming from. I just feel that type of fantasy is better served by the written word, where realities and motivations can be addressed. In my opinion, a picture gallery can't be justified as "free speech" if it does nothing more than depict a crime, in a positive framework.
|
Mishi, I am sorry, but I can not find that line you are talking about between the site what started this thread and BDSM sites listed at your LL, with descriptions like
"Kidnapped slave girl is tied and gagged in ropes" or
"Pussy punishment of poor beautiful girl in bondage". These does not sound very consensual to me. I am asking, where do you see such a difference to say this one will be banned and the second ones listed? If I would use UW's words I can talk about kidnapped girls who were held long months and even years by sick bastards. I will not do it. There is no doubt that rape and kidnapping are the worst crimes, even worse than murder in some cases. But these free sites are about sexual fantasies that normal healthy people have (proven fact) so I see no reason to ban them.
From my point of view I found much more harmful pregnant niche and I am seriously thinking to remove it from my LL.