View Single Post
Old 2005-05-24, 10:22 PM   #7
MrYum
Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs!
 
MrYum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sunny Florida!
Posts: 5,108
Send a message via ICQ to MrYum
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stever
Watermark was a seperate question unrelated to 2257.

Also, 2257 question had to do with how people link to it, either their own 2257 page or the sponsors. Not the regulations.

I know that the news aboutt 2257 regs has everyone thinking about it but these questions have nothing to do with the regs. Just reviewers opinions on these two seperate questions.
Yep, spot on Stevers. Glad that's working out for ya

Thanks GG and Alex...I know the 2257 news is on everyone's mind...for good reason. But, wasn't really asking about the new regs. Was more looking at how people are currently handling providing 2257 on sites using sponsor content.

Now, that the new regs are in place...perhaps all bets are off. But, I can't imagine that anyone is going to try to comply with this lunacy by posting home addresses on sites

So, business goes on...we get our ducks in a row...and see how this thing shakes out over time. In the mean time, we keep building and go about our business...it is a business after all and must be fed to grow.

So, back to the question at hand...how are folks currently handling providing 2257 for sponsor content?
MrYum is offline   Reply With Quote