View Single Post
Old 2005-05-29, 02:49 AM   #10
Paul Markham2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by guitar riff
Paul that theory is OK but one flaw doesnt matter if they are outside the US if they market to the US they are still responsible to the law.

And I agreee with the stalking theory not only the models but just wait til the bible thumpers in the bible belt find out timmy the holy roller does porn on the side.

And another note if ya think about it Ok you and any others that run a content site you show previews of the pics or movie still right . You market to webmasters in the US as well as anywhere else in the world So In other words You Are required to post the 2257 info also and that includes the model ID's your home address and name and so on ... am I correct in my reading of the amendment?

So what will happen down the road if all goes to shit and law stays the way it is written right now with no amendments to it . I see alot of girls not venturing down the porn road and risking the exposure.
Maybe I'm wrong but thats just my opinion
I agree that if sponsors give out IDs there will be a slow drying up of models and this side of porn will be hurt.

As for the US authorities checking what I have in my filing cabinet, they are welcome to do this whenever they present themselves at my door with a Czech search warrant. Should they say I don't comply becasue I did not allow them access I wil get the EU to sue them.
  Reply With Quote