Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ponygirl
Tickler - do you have any other info about this, I would be interested in looking it up, thx
|
Okay dear you can start here:
http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Jdb-txt/...05BCSC0446.htm
It's actual court stuff, so a long read, and a lot to try digesting. Make your own conclusions.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ponygirl
ps - I have yet to see (or be lol) a topless woman walking down the street in my town, altho the precident was set not too far from here  |
I kive next to a beach which is mainly a younger crowd. So I see it occasionally. Have also seen it up at Washago. Also some of the dancers at my favorite strip club set outside on the patio topless working on their tans.
Paul, I can't find the actual article at the moment, but, it really doesn't really matter 1,2,3...pieces of ID. What I was getting at is under
Sec. 75.2 Maintenance of records a)2) "Producers may rely in good faith on representations by performers regarding accuracy of the names" and I assume IDs.
Paul, also some reading for you:
http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...tent_ID=228409
Maybe they are trying to leave the back door open by requiring a US issued ID.
amber438:
Sec. 75.4 If the producer ceases to carry on the business, the records shall be maintained for five years thereafter.
Even if they have gone out of business, they are still required to maintain records for 5 years. So hopefully you can still retrieve some of the info.
RedCherry:
Just removing the pics might not be enough. This wording
(including but not limited to Internet computer site or services) has me thinking that if you just have the content. it must be documented also.
One thing that does PO about this is that I 90% of the time only use softcore content and hold back the hardcore for maybe a future paysite. But, because the set(s) have hardcore in them, I still need to go through the BS.
A question for maybe
Alex. Any takes on this wording from 75.8(d)
"any known major entry points".
Found a side-by-each comparison of the old vs. proposed vs. actual 2257 here:
http://my.execpc.com/~xxxlaw/2257Tables5.24.05.htm