|
ardentgent, it truly is not clear to me that softcore porn promotions are going to be exempt, and more importantly, I am not clear that they exempt people from the worst part of this law, meeting the requirements to publish a custodian of records, list an office, and so on.
You get into very questionable areas when you are promoting hardcore sites with softcore content, or using hardcore terms around softcore content.
Imagine a "child art" site (I hate the term). They do fall into a legal hole that says "art is good". However, if you mention fucking or anything on that part, it loses it's art status and becomes, well, porn.
Without keeping records and without having proper model identification, how do you prove it isn't child porn as per 2256? How do you prove that the entire work is exempt (IE, the photoshoot wasn't mixed hard and soft material)?
I am really not comfortable with trying to dodge something like this. Your in porn or your not, come on out of the closet.
Alex
|