View Single Post
Old 2005-06-17, 08:06 AM   #22
SirMoby
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
 
SirMoby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linkster
Alex - I dont know where you found that in the regs but if you could point it out Id appreciate it
The only thing I can find is that the secondary producer "may" obtain the documentation from the primary producer - and in fed reg talk which is defined in another reg - "may" means they can but are not required to and would not be in violation if they didnt
Now if they used the word "shall" or "will" then it becomes a reg requirement - again this is all definied in another reg on how to write regs
It was in the comments but not in the actual regulations.
SirMoby is offline   Reply With Quote