Thread: question.......
View Single Post
Old 2005-09-17, 09:36 PM   #18
RobUK
I'm going to the backseat of my car with the woman I love, and I won't be back for TEN MINUTES
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linkster
More importantly - and I guess this just goes back to old school stuff that Im used to - when I was submitting to LLs - I would go check my stats - and if a site didnt list me I would stop submitting.
Fair enough, but what about sites that take weeks or months to approve a submission? Only the other day one of my sites that I submitted several months ago was approved on a list that I'd taken out of my submit table for exactly that reason.

Seems to me that if LLs don't tell someone they're blacklisted they're bound to keep on submitting, at least for a while - how are they to know that the list doesn't have a huge backlog, or they simply don't like the most recent submissions or...

Of course, cheaters must be a HUGE pain in the ass for LL owners, and I'm in favour of blacklisting every last one of em. But it seems a little unfair to do it in secret, lest other submitters become unwittingly caught in the net.

Rob.
RobUK is offline   Reply With Quote