[kenny]

Originally Posted by DangerDave

Lets get something straight.. there is no "situation" to be resolved

Just because Kit thinks his site belongs in DMOZ - does not make it a fact or certainty.

That site is probably one of the best review sites in the adult Industry - I think it should be rather OBVIOUS that it belongs there.

In fact I think the site in question is Superior to any of the sites currently listed in that directory.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

How to suggest a site to the Open Directory
http://dmoz.org/add.html

Yes - that is exactly how it's suppose to be..

You mean to tell me you actually think that webmasters volunteer to edit that shit out of the kindness of their hearts?

Please..

Originally Posted by DangerDave

Another completely unfounded sweeping generalisation - so often extolled by people that have never been a DMOZ editor.

Run a whois spider through the directories and tell me you won't find multiple sites listed that belong to DMOZ editors under the very directories that they edit.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

More unfounded bullshit... - again an opinion so often extolled by people that have never been a DMOZ editor.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out - if you think these acquisitions are incorrect then you're probably in the minority.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

Good to see you are disproving your own generalisations.

I never said all editors were corrupt - besides it's kind of hard to capitalize in a non profit directory.

I'm simply implying the level of corruption increases inside the directories when there is more to be gained.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

There IS still spammy stuff in DMOZ.. without question... AND the present Adult editors work most days to rid DMOZ of crap like that.. Dont blame current editors for the system they inherited.

Probably alot of it belongs to the old editors - lol

Seriously though most of the adult webmasters who apply for that volunteer job do it for their own personal advantage. There is really nothing else to be gained.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

.. and what would you base that opinion on? blind assumption and speculation?

You mean besides the obvious nature of it?

Basicly I put two and two together - I've seen BS like this happen dozens of times in DMOZ. This is by no means a isolated incident.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

More unsupported generalisations and assumptions based on board roumours..

In your prespective

Originally Posted by DangerDave

Site deletions or additions are subject to change or deletion at any time at our sole discretion. This is the guidelines that you agree to at the time of submission!

Yes - their discretion being largely for personal gain.

Originally Posted by DangerDave

Lets face facts... you have no idea what you are talking about.

You're mistaken if that is what you think.

You're trying to tell me that there is no corruption in DMOZ..

The notion of that is utterly ridiculous

Originally Posted by DangerDave

Why? because you said so? I think you credit yourse3lf with too much influence

DD

Because it's a dinosaur. It takes years to review sites.

It no longer serves a purpose with the exception of boosting a search engine rank