Hi UW
Very interesting your thread.
I do not know what are thinking other webmasters, but my opinion is the following:
My sites normally had been linked by 80 or 90% of the ll that I submitted that are all major ll. (I only submit to 12 or 16 ll, and I have not doorways).
THEN, I think: if these major ll had linked my site the problem is not an error in my site, the problem is that the ll that had not linked my site had a lot of sites submitted and obviously had to reject a lot of them. Because of I dont care about it.
I think that the time that I losted with that ll will no come again: only one site for day.
Also, one thing is that someone will insult you in front of all the people of the board, and another thing is that the same person will insult you in an email.
After the insult in the board, if you will defence yourself, other will insult you too in defence of who had insulted you in first time, because they are friends, may be because there is a clear syndicalized procedure of ll owners.
I only posted for sites rejected for 2 ll, and I think that it was a big bad mistake that I do not want to repeat.
Talleyrand
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Useless Warrior
I'm noticing more and more submitters are so busy cranking out free sites that they just seem to ignore the fact that a great many of their sites are getting tossed instantly into the trash. It seems like such a wasted effort, like going down on a dead a chick. Lick all night, but she's not going to cum. She might fart, but definately won't cum.
If you get rejection emails from link lists <shameless plug> like mine </shameless plug> that tell you to come HERE and inquire why you've been rejected, why not ask? Hell, why waste the effort of submitting if you don't care whether or not your sites are listed? No one is going to bite you. Might call you a rotten cocksucker, but no teeth will be bared.
Establishing contact with reviewers who reject your sites is the best thing you can do if you plan on regularly submitting free sites. For one, those of us who reject your sites may be expecting a level of quality that may be higher than other lists. If you can find out what is flawed in your sites, you will begin to build better sites that are more widely accepted. Secondly, you may be making some major mistakes and don't even realize it. Plus, when we know WHO you are, we have been known to let the minor things slide. Just show us that you care about what you do.
I know what you're saying right now. You're saying, "fuck you and fuck Earl too." Well, first of all, that hurts. Now you've gone and made Earl get all teary-eyed. You bastard.
You should think of the smaller link lists as a litmus test. If we don't accept your sites, what makes you think that the big boys and girls will let you play in their reindeer games? I know, I know, some smaller/newer lists have some pretty fucked-up rules. Don't submit to them. Okay? Generally speaking though, we all pretty much run under the same guidelines and look for the same things. So if you get a rejection notice - ask. After you ignore a few rejections, it becomes so much easier to just blacklist you. No one wants that. Well, Earl wants to blacklist you, but that's only because you hurt his feelings. You bastard.
|