I'm avoiding responding to it because MOST PEOPLE are getting tired of the off-topic B.S.
The red/period stuff has been hashed over a number of times on this board to no avail. If people who weren't already involved in those discussions had an honest desire to understand why I make period porn and what is socially redeeming about it, they could simply go to my site or do a search for those threads.
As for Useless' initial charge, it is clear that he didn't understand my points the first time, so what is the point of trying to make them a second time? But fine, I'll try again: I don't think all or even most porn needs to have redeeming qualities. My point was that if we're presenting arguments to anti-porn people, being able to provide examples of porn that DOES have socially redeeming qualities might help us make more convincing arguments.
It seems like you guys read animosity into things where it doesn't even exist, and then you start a flame war.
Examples: FurryGirl says, "many feminists are against us" and a few people hear, "FurryGirl is a feminist and she hates us! US! And she is not one of US! Begone, foul feminist!"
I could say "the sky is blue" right now and you guys would be like, "but you want to paint it red with your menstrual fluid and the blood of tgp and linklist owners! Arrr! You can't fool me, I *know* you're a she-devil!"
This is why I try not to waste time hanging around here and other boards -- judging from your posts, it's feels like a waste of time and energy to try to dialogue with some of you guys. My time is better spent talking to the people who pay me: those guys with their cocks in one hand and their mice in the others.