Yesterday a bill passed through the House of Representatives that will make changes to 2257 and then ADD a section that would require 2257 data be maintained for "simulated sexual conduct". [2257 A ]
Many of the arguments in the FSC case hinge on the theory that the Attorney General cannot define "secondary producers" because that goes farther than the law [which Congress makes] allows. If Congress includes "secondary producers" under 2257 then the best argument against it would be that the law is overbroad or unconstitutional in some way, a more difficult argument to win.
The language in the bill is confusing, and I still have not come up with a good interpretation as to what its effects would be. The most important section is Section 602.
Read it and lets talk.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/.../~c109Wr8cRI::