View Single Post
Old 2006-03-08, 11:45 PM   #10
RawAlex
Took the hint.
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,597
Send a message via AIM to RawAlex
Well, this is the house version, hasn't passed congress yet, and honestly the laws in this form are darn hard to read. Further, they have to make clear WHICH version of 2257 they are attempting to makes these amendments to. If they claim to be amending the 2257 as passed in 1995ish, then that would suggest that the house does not find that the "clarifications" that the DoJ tried to dump on us last year hold water, which could have the effect of negating all the work done by the FSC in the last year.

I look forward to one or the other of the online XXX lawyers to post up what the resulting code will look like so I can read it closely and attempt to extract some meaning from it.

Alex
RawAlex is offline   Reply With Quote