Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Halfdeck
ecchi, I didn't say his point was invalid.
Paul, there's nothing wrong with content providers voicing their opinion, but you aren't really discussing an issue, you're advertising. Nothing wrong with that either, but then don't be surprised when people don't buy your arguments because your words are agenda-driven.
You're not really succeeding in building trust with this thread. You refuse to look at free content/traffic issue from all sides. Ultimately, the choice between free/bought content depends on who you promote and how you promote them.
You make a sweeping generalization that ultimately leads to the convenient conclusion -- everyone should buy content, specifically your content. Your last few posts are nothing but "Have I got a deal for you!" I just don't buy it.
|
You have me wrong.
I can see instances where free content is good, when the niche or style of the site is such that it has to be content from the site. When a site is so under promoted content from the site and bought have no difference, when am affiliate is new and learning how to drive traffic buying could break him. When it is simply not profitable to buy.
But there are many instances when buying content to drive traffic is a good choice the one stumbling block is that the bought content is not on the site, my option resolves that.
My harsh words about GUBA are about anyone who makes money from stolen content and content submitted to newsgroups is often stolen, selling access to it is not on as far as I'm concerned.