Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PornFact
Yes, and I did missed removing them. I guess I was too fast editing the keywords, pasting it in every template I made and was too focus on the words kids, under-age, ch1ld porn and the like.. Guess, not having english as a first language is something to do with it too coz I can't quickly recognize a foul language since "pre" most of the time is used on sentences that has nothing to do with porn.
|
See, that's part of what's rubbing me the wrong way with your story...and it's exactly why I asked you about that particular term.
As mentioned, I did a keyterm search using the Overture tool (probably the same keyterm you sued)...and yes indeed...it's obvious that is where you got the list. However, that particular phrase shows up on the Overture tool with the words sequenced differently than you had them. So, you had to have actually seen that phrase and re-ordered the words before using them.
When I add that fact in along with the following:
March 9th - Mateusz told you he'd list your sites if you remove the cp keywords. You agreed and complied.
March 10th - Fonz told you using the word 'young' isn't recommended.
March 11th - I told you not to combine the words young and teen. You agreed and went so far as to say you'd remove the words from your vocabulary.
April 4th - Swedguy told you he'd rejected your site for using 'young' and 'teen' together. You responded that you'd fix it on your next submission.
April 8th - I post regarding your keyterms and receive 4 or 5 more sites with the same keyterms over the next few days...untill you finally show up on the board.
Frankly, I wanted to pull together that information for myself as much as anything else...to make sure I'm not jumping to conclusions here. But nope...really don't think I am. The evidence is pretty damning.
Not only were you warned repeatedly, you came back and actually started submitting something far worse than the samples you were warned about.
Pornfact, I honestly don't know what your deal is at this point. I don't buy the language barrier thing...your english is far too good not to recognize that pr3 t33n is wrong. You obviously saw that phrase and reordered the words on at least one of the keyterms.
The evidence is pretty fuckin over-whelming that this was not a mistake, and you were hoping no one would notice those metas. Frankly, with as many words as you had stuffed in there...it would have been easy to miss. However, speaking for myself...a huge keyword meta sets off red flags...causing me to look closer.