|
Boogie, I agree. The trick for us is to find a way to now drive a huge wedge between 2257 and child porn, showing that 2257 clear up the issues of "slightly underage models", and it isn't the same as daddy fucking his 5 year old daughter on a webcam.
2557 is a rule for legit businesses to make legit porn. Nobody stopped making CP because of 2257 - but technically it does because it obliges us to check to make sure models are old enough. It won't stop the type of digusting child abuse that is out there, and making that point in the public forum and in the media is to me a key way that the porn industry can put some distance between itself and the clearly and obviously illegal CP mongers.
There is a chance here to seperate the two - we should exploit it!
Alex
|