View Single Post
Old 2006-06-30, 02:08 PM   #42
Jim
Banned
 
Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mohawk, New York
Posts: 19,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Tom
I dont think that it stems from paying someone to perform in a real shoot, or porn movie. The thing went down when they were paid to have sex at a private party that was not filmed. That was from the informant. So it could be bad for them, but not bad for porn producers in general (which I think is what people should probably hope for? I dunno)

Again it was laid out a bit better in the original article. They arrested them after the informant told them about the private party evidently. That one is going to stick unless the informant was/is a total unbelieveable flake on the stand I guess.
That would change everything. Take the camera out of the "picture" and I think it would be considered prostitution. Jesus, even a simple tape recorder would have protected them.
Jim is offline   Reply With Quote