Greenguy's Board - View Single Post

thrillho · 2004-01-04, 06:23 AM

If you can get your hands on a copy of Fireworks by Macromedia, I've found that its batch processing feature is a bit quicker and easier to use than Photoshop. Fireworks also seems to be able to crunch your file sizes down considerably smaller than Photoshop with less obvious loss of picture quality. That being said, Fireworks can't touch Photoshop as far as actual image repair and manipulation--w/r/t bitmapped images, I use FW strictly for optimization.

2004-01-04, 06:23 AM	#7
thrillho Kids are great, Appu. You can teach them to hate the things you hate and they practically raise themselves now-a-days, you know, with the internet and all Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 194	If you can get your hands on a copy of Fireworks by Macromedia, I've found that its batch processing feature is a bit quicker and easier to use than Photoshop. Fireworks also seems to be able to crunch your file sizes down considerably smaller than Photoshop with less obvious loss of picture quality. That being said, Fireworks can't touch Photoshop as far as actual image repair and manipulation--w/r/t bitmapped images, I use FW strictly for optimization.