XXX Jay, given this article
http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=16215 which states in part
Quote:
Free Speech Coalition attorney Jeffrey Douglas, who said that the law mandates that so-called secondary producers — a group that likely includes adult webmasters — will be required to comply with 2257.
In addition to expanding liability to secondary producers, the proposed law also mandates record-keeping for films and images containing depictions of “lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.”
According to Douglas, that means that exhibitions of mere nudity could fall under the 2257 record-keeping regime.
|
Does it sound like we can still just hand them a form that we are secondary producers only?