View Single Post
Old 2006-07-28, 05:50 PM   #24
Toby
Lonewolf Internet Sales
 
Toby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,826
Send a message via ICQ to Toby
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill
Has anyone come across anything like a plain language explanation of what the secondary producers will have to do to comply, written for secondary producers, and not for lawyers?

I haven't.
Same as primary producers. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but what this new law does essentially is make anyone that publishes sexually explicit content a producer, no primary or secondary designation, just everyone is a producer and must keep the specified records.

They just keep making 2257 an even bigger mess. It's going to take some time and lots of money for lawyers, but I don't see much chance for most of this law, as it pertains to 2257, holding up under legal challenge. I think we'll see an injunction against this new part too.

I'd guess that it will be the major topic of discussion at the legal seminar during Internext.
Toby is offline   Reply With Quote