Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon IA Cash
I would imagine it comes down to shooting. As long as content providers aren't shooting asses only, no webmaster's gonna feel comfortable chucking the rest of the shoot. If webmasters shoot their own content or pay for custom, it's more doable, but still. The girl's willing to be in porn. You really gonna not take shots of her tits?
Also, getting the girls isn't necessarily easy. A subset of girls shoot for porn, and a subset of those have nice asses. Don't necessarily need Keyra-level, but definitely very nice. That's why you don't see "Nice Tits" as a category, only "Big Tits". Easier to find big tits than it is to find nice tits (and I'm not a fan of the fakies look). The only consistent category where there is a specifically elevated standard as part of the category is "Babes", which is general as it is.
|
I have to disagree here. Most webmasters catering to a specific niche and who is worth his salt would be quite happy to cull the set in favour of those specific shots his members are interested in.
There is no 'nice tits' category because 'nice' is subjective.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and the internet drives that point home. What you consider to be a nice ass or tits may or may not appeal to someone else. In a highly targeted niche, members are quite happy to forego the "one million photos" in order to have the 2000 that they are specifically interested in; and pay a premium in the process.
A recent example: Last week I requested that members of balloon-guys.com email me with feedback to a couple of specific questions. The response was unanimous. They have zero interest in us adding a bit of gay oriented but non-balloon fetish material as a bonus, nor are they the least bit interested in live cam upsells. They come for the highly prized and rare collection of material we provide, and nothing more.
Did I mention that these members are incredibly loyal too? :-)