Quote:
Originally Posted by RamCharger
Based on whose numbers? The people he sent to "recount" the votes? There's something wrong when a side with a vested interest in the outcome who dispatches people on his behalf that also have a vested interest in seeing their guy get in office is given more credibility than the system that never seemingly had any criticism until that point in time.
|
Dubya got 50,000,000 votes and Gore got 51,000,000 votes. That's what was written in the fact books. That wasn't based on recount numbers that was based on final numbers. You should really learn a little about a subject before you post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RamCharger
Should we have a pitty party for every president that rolls into office who is now in the drivers seat to handle the difficult decisions of his predecessor?
|
GB sent troops to 2 countries
after he lost and Iraq wasn't one of them (I only asked to see if you knew anything about that period of time and you should twice that you don't). He sent the troops to screw the next guy. Just like congress not doing their job and voting on all the spending bills this past term. They lost, they'll get their pension so why should they do a good job when they can make it difficult for the winners? Isn't that exactly what they did? Isn't that exactly what Daddy B did?
It's obvious that you don't know your history but now it seems you don't know current affairs either.
I won't bother to read or comment on the rest of your post. I'm sure it's as off base as what you've already posted.
No hard feelings. Just because you don't know shit about the past decade or current affairs doesn't mean you don't have a lot to offer a webmaster board
