Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxthrills
Why in the world would you want to offer even more higher quality and extremely large photos for free when there is so much free porn for the surfer to jerk off to without having to buy?
|
Member's area photos keep getting larger and with a higher resolution, and yet you still want to market them like it's 1999?
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxthrills
Adult webmasters over the years have been following the herd mentalitly of the wildebeests or better still the herd of dinosaurs who were frightened and stampeded to their deaths. They ended up going over a cliff, falling into a fast moving river where they drowned en masse only to be fossilized for eternity. If adult link lists and tgps continue to offer higher and higher quality free porn, you may also go the way of these dinosaurs!
|
Member's area photos keep getting larger and with a higher resolution, and yet you still want to market them like it's 1999? Who's the dinosaur here?
Clickbuster had a made a surprisingly good point in the the tube thread you mentioned. Link Links have remained pretty much unchanged, at least in the surfers' eyes, for a very long time. Increasing the pic count and quality is one the first steps of modernization in a long, long time. We can't accurately portray the product being marketed through the use of 600px photos anymore, nor can we be competitive with the new tube sites that are preparing to launch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxthrills
What I ask is that you re-consider and change this rule to the longest side being 600 pixels for pic (especially for pornstar photos).
|
You're making your argument, as weak as it is, months after the policy change. And it's just silly that you'd say "especially for pornstar photos". So, it's all about you. Your niche. Your bandwidth.
