Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenie
Yeah, but if you throw in there that 4/8 are solo, then maybe you ca see why we declined it.
If both galleries had movies like ones ones in the 2nd gallery, then I'd have no problem with it.
|
ok... So if my first gallery had a guy in them with no anal sex going on... like this one....
http://www.ladypushporn.com/assarmy/ebony/
it would have been accepted? Or what category would it been more suitable for?
Given what you typically accept, I can see that I shouldn't have had 2 "teaser" clips, but I don't understand not accepting it even though the girl is doing solo anal. From a marketing standpoint I'm trying to sell the girl and that the site gives a variety of anal action. As someone who "likes" anal, I prefer to see something like that, as opposed to just slamming away at an ass all the time, or even the DP which you seem to get lots of sites for.
I'm trying to make sales, thus market to the surfer and am trying to find that "sweet spot" where my sites get accepted but I can still tease the surfer enough without giving everything away. Something that seems to be at odds with what typically gets accepted at a lot of sites. So before I cut up anymore clips, I'd like to know the "bare minimum" I can get away with and still get accepted.
This isn't a bash or anything as you've accepted other sites of mine, but it's very frustrating when we all know that we'd all get more sales if there was less "free" porn out there.