View Single Post
Old 2004-02-20, 08:37 PM   #6
creamxtreme
WHO IS FONZY!?! Don't they teach you anything at school?
 
creamxtreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 49
Send a message via AIM to creamxtreme
Thanks All for this input!

Now, coming back into this thread:

According to two research firms (not mentioned for the sake of not giving anyone a bad name) that there is a higher acceptance of FS's that have an index.htm or index.html as the first page in the FS.

However, while looking at several of your sites, I did not find this to be true. In fact, I found the total opposite.

There were pages named warning.html, bigtits.html etc., etc. and even a few .asp pages. And in good positions, as well.

As all of you have mentioned it really does not matter much, as to the extension or even the file name. However, would there be a higher acceptance level at your own sites, if the FS did in fact start with an index.html, index.htm page?

Or is this something none of you gave much thought too? I am only adding this for the sake of others who may look into this thread while it is active. I pretty much have the clear message from you that if the site is a quality site, it will get listed no matter what the start page was.

Thanks again,
Nick
__________________
Reserved til I figure it out - do I even have the slightest clue?
creamxtreme is offline   Reply With Quote