Quote:
Originally posted by Greenguy
You know what I think? I think you're all fucked in the head? We're 15 miles from the fucking Fun Park & you wanna go home!
Ok - my take on all this...
DrB does ask me questions about free sites from time to time, seeing as I run a link list & he is my friend. Every now & then he asks me a "Is this a standard practice....?" kinda question & yesterday was one of those times. I've never heard of a free site being rejected for pages on the domain that are not even linked to from the free site itself. Seems kinda strange & odd to me & I told DrB that - actually, my exact quote from ICQ was "that's really strange & not a normal practice that I've ever heard of"
It also didn't click in my head at the time that Mondo Erotica was doublep (of course, once I saw the avatar, I remembered - LOL)
I do think it is a strange rule - and this is coming from the guy that co-wrote most of the strange rules that webmasters read on a lot of link lists to this day 
But, I am also a firm believer of "My Site, My Rules" policy & would never hold that against anyone.
Opti - you were a bit out of line - for one thing, the only mention of the word "Nazi" was by our very own Nazi, DangerDave - and I know this was in jest, along the lines of "no one should have rules tougher then mine" For another, DrB did what I would have done had I submitted & been declined for that reason, he asked a question - on a board that is set up for asking questions exactly like the one he posted.
|
Well said GG!!
There is no harm in double checking to see what is standard practice and what isn't, hell it made me think more in-depth about my reviewing practices and I don't see how bringing up a topic without pointing fingers is a bad thing, especially if its not slamming someone.