Quote:
Originally posted by CybrFire
Hey Sec_man, you know after re-reading what you had said about if one accepts MILFs doing a younger man, than why not accept a young woman doing an older guy...than why not list that dads&babes stuff (if it's done tastefully)
I still get some of that content, but not to my surprise, the same guy who was submitting that, just started submitting the index linked to nothing but a full page add!
LOL...guess I started declining sooner than I thaught. I'm still accepting the dads&babes stuff...but only if it's done in a tastefull way though.
|
yup, i think that is the real key to all this, as owners we seem to be too quick on the delete button many times. i like volume and unless its a real violation, not just worded funny i will list it.
jaden, that is a good point. but keep in mind there are 2257 statements on a lot of ****** sites too. Technically they are legal because of the "non-sexual" loophole. many times i see sites with full on legal 2257 statements that say things like "the models depected here are all in non sexual situations" instead of flat out "all models appearing on this website were over 18 at the time of photography"
just keep in mind that just cuz they have a legal 2257 doesnt mean you wanna have anything to do with em
