View Single Post
Old 2009-11-29, 01:56 PM   #6
papagmp
That'll teach you to leave your sister unattended.....
 
papagmp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 1,803
Send a message via ICQ to papagmp
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickler View Post
They are trying to backdoor this through the credit card processors, and you can bet they will be arguing all about how it's part of FTC doing business regulating stuff, rather than an attack on porn.

So with no way for a site to verify a visitor, the processors can't let you make money. I guess we could go back to checks to a P.O.Box
Accept the check - without age verification and face jail time.................. This has nothing to do with protecting kids and everything to do with putting us out of business.

I tried contacting the Colorado Senator on the committee and he blocks all emails that are not from constituents in his district. Monday morning a letter goes out to his office - along with one to every other prick on that committee.

Sad truth is - none of them want to come out looking like they support porn (or don't want to protect children) and the cock suckers that wrote the bill know that - thus the title.

Bottom line - this will put hundreds of small operators out of business just like 2257 did and that IS their goal.

And the cock suckers mask it by claiming to protect children - and millions of "parents" with jump on board because it's obviously the governments job to protect their children. Truth is, these are the same lazy fucking parents that can't tell you where their 16 year old daughter is at 11pm on a school night after they let her drive to her friends alone because they are too fucking lazy to supervise anything in their children's life.
__________________

Submit: OutlawFreePorn
papagmp is offline   Reply With Quote