Is there something about this in the terms? I don't recall it, altho it was years ago that I read the terms for the first time.
It sounds like you are making a fairly complex distinction.
If I understand you correctly, you are saying it's okay to put homegrown banner advertising on general amateur hardcore pages, but not okay to name or title free sites as "homegrown" sites if they don't have content from the homegrown site.
I understand brand management, and that it is becoming more important, but I've been around a while, and this is the first I've heard of these distinctions you are making.
It sounds like an important topic, please explain further. Taking chuckiepoos theoretical case as an example, what are the specific issues you would have, and what would be your companies response to cases like this?
|