View Single Post
Old 2004-08-02, 02:29 PM   #56
lassiter
I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman!
 
lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 473
Send a message via ICQ to lassiter Send a message via Yahoo to lassiter
Quote:
Originally posted by Cleo
Not sure what other list sites think of this but I'm not sure if I should continue listing your sites.
Ethics aside, and just talking legality regarding 2257, there is nothing in the regulations regarding off-site linking.
As long as no explicit images are actually stored on your domains or websites, you are nor repsonsible for 2257 recordkeeping. So a text-only TGP is totally exempt from 2257, whereas one that captures explicit thumbnails is subject to 2257.

I see a lot of talk about LLs & TGPs not linking to sites without 2257 info, but my attorneys say mere linking (to anything other than obvious CP, which is always an exception) is not an issue under 2257.

If anyone has in fact been told differently, please advise what language in the rulemaking would make a webmaster responsible for what is on another webmaster's domain?
lassiter is offline   Reply With Quote