|
I wasn't necessarily thinking about sponsor vs non-sponsor content, but about the compression, size and general quality of whatever pic you put on your free site.
Maybe it's because I work in 4women, I'm thinking differently about this. For me, it's all about showing the surfer something different, something she's been searching for and hasn't been able to find, as opposed to "this is new and top quality, you haven't seen this before".
So, the way I approach free sites for men may have been skewed by that.
And maybe this is where the quality issue comes in.
When making a free site you can focus on what's actually happening in the photo e.g. the actual content - what the person is doing, what she looks like etc So... this applies to fetishes, and maybe the more obscure things where the surfer is after something in particular.
But if what you're offering can be found on a million other free sites e.g. blonde chick getting undressed, you then need to focus on the quality and freshness of the photo.
So... if your site is more about the relative rareness of the content, quality and freshness of the photo may not be such an issue.
Although, I guess it doesn't hurt to have a good quality pic...
I'm thinking out loud here, and probably going in circles.
But the other major issue which I still have a problem is this: if we keep upping the quality of pics on free sites, where does it end?
At the moment there's gigs of free porn out there. If we start offering gigs of high quality free porn, what's left for a paysite to offer?
Surely there's a middle ground.
|