|
One article on the internet does not a fact make
There are standard processes called "scientific method" and "peer review"(etc.) that this 'article lacks... thereby making it 'opinion'.(and we all know about opinions - they are like assholes!)
There are no references in this persons 'article'. He just rattles off facts like they are a given, when many are based on supposition and information the person is unlikely to "know"
He calls the article "Is Google broken?" again making it nothing but a theory.
In his first paragraph he says Between Aug 04, 2003 and Aug 25, 2003 (just 21 days), Google added a little over 1.2 billion Web pages to their index. - how does he know? did he index all of them by hand himself? did he take the number off the front page Google and just accept that it was fact?
If I write an 'article' on "That Greeny's dick size is proportionally based on the number of charcaters on his index page between 1997 and now", and get 100 people to post back to it saying "Hmm.. yes, that's true!" does that make it fact? no it makes it BULLSHIT, because that was what it was, when it was written.
DD
|