Cleo,
Those two links are from submits to LL's that accept FPA's. The different colored page each has is an FPA.
Re: them looking like they are script generated - I feel that's entirely a matter of opinion. They were made by me, by hand, in Dreamweaver/Photoshop. No script stuff at all.
One of the periods I got my email banned in, I did the following sites:
http://www.daily-porn.net/babewife/
http://www.hotsexythumbs.com/toyspussy/
I actually purchased software to assist me in making logos and buttons so that I could keep myself from getting banned.
I should add that I've never had any difficulty getting listed at Cleo's, and I don't want to start having difficulty now, so... no offense meant.
And my post isn't some slam on LL's or their owners in general. I realize what we're dealing with is sheer volume. Making it hard to differentiate.
The truth is, though, my sites aren't generated by a script, I don't cheat, I don't reuse content, I don't use overused sponsor content, etc. But I still get banned. And I go through link lists, and I see sites that, to be honest, don't look like they're breaking the originality barrier either, which means it's opinion based. I think templates should be held to mean templates. I was venting on it, and I think it's something that needs some reform.
Sure, I recognize it's not likely to happen - but rather than fume about it, it was worth a post.
