LL Owners, Would You List...

MadMax · 2005-10-27, 12:34 PM

A site that shows the models snorting coke (or at least looking like it) before fucking?

I have mixed feelings, looking for opinions..

http://www.getmaxpleasure.com/page06/ass/

JohnnyR · 2005-10-27, 12:40 PM

I'm no LL owner so maybe this isn't my place to say, but IMHO coke is definately way worse then sex/porn

Surfn · 2005-10-27, 12:44 PM

I wouldn't list it.

ponygirl · 2005-10-27, 12:46 PM

that's a tough one...I really don't like it personally so that would probably sway my decision. Drugs could imply non-consent as well - it doesn't look like that in these pics but it still bugs me. Plus, coke is a little more illegal than anal sex (in most places I would imagine lol) so...

I'd have to say I wouldn't accept sites depicting drug use. Just my personal opinion, it's not a bad site.

my little weenie 2 cents

Ponygirl

sue-fl · 2005-10-27, 12:52 PM

I agree it's a tough decision. But I wouldn't list it. It's a personal choice for me also which is probably not a good reason to decline it. I don't list sites that I would have to think about the next day should I have listed that or not.

Preacher · 2005-10-27, 01:05 PM

Probably not making any fans here, but yes I would.

In fact, I have a similiar pic on my site already: Scroll Down!

Why? Here's a few reasons. Well I'm more depraved then most. Coke and the porn industry go hand in hand. As far as non-consent, coke isn't like a rufey. I think dead drunk girls is more offensive and I've listed those. I'm not influencing children here, if I am I have other problems. Would you list the site if they were smoking pot instead?

BUT, I would not begrudge anyone else for not listing it, nor would I defend my views to the grave. I guess this is just one of the few instances my views go against the grain.

ponygirl · 2005-10-27, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preacher

Probably not making any fans here, but yes I would.

In fact, I have a similiar pic on my site already: Scroll Down!

Why? Here's a few reasons. Well I'm more depraved then most. Coke and the porn industry go hand in hand. As far as non-consent, coke isn't like a rufey. I think dead drunk girls is more offensive and I've listed those. I'm not influencing children here, if I am I have other problems. Would you list the site if they were smoking pot instead?

BUT, I would not begrudge anyone else for not listing it, nor would I defend my views to the grave. I guess this is just one of the few instances my views go against the grain.

good points for sure. I think with me it's more personal than anything - the site in question really isn't that offensive to me, I wouldn't blacklist for stuff like that or anything. Nor would I think anything of any LLs that did list it. But like Sue said, I wouldn't want to have it gnawing at my morals (yes, I really do have some

)

I would definitely draw the line at stuff like portraying injectables & stuff like that.

oh and yes, I would list a site where they're smoking pot - I'm not that much of a hypocrite

Ponygirl

MrYum · 2005-10-27, 01:27 PM

Not even a tough decision here, I wouldn't touch a site that depicts anything obviously illegal...coke or pot or whatever. But then, I don't list any of the dead drunk girls stuff either.

We've got way more than enough scrutiny these days as it is. Imo, the last thing we need to do is add more fuel to the fire. Making the correlation between consentual adult entertainment and drugs...or girls so drunk that consent is questionable...is the last thing we need to do.

MadMax · 2005-10-27, 04:14 PM

I've decided not to list it. Essentially, my POV coincides with Mr Yum's. While I'm personally a big fan of drugs and sex, we're on shaky footing as an industry and I don't see any reason to tempt fate. Thanks for all the input everyone.

RawAlex · 2005-10-27, 04:54 PM

Okay, my 2 cents canadian.

Quite simple: A model taking coke is not able to properly give consent to any act that has occured after the point on intoxication. Therefore, the material shows "non consentual sex acts" which is illegal in Canada. For those who want simple words, it is a form of rape.

Would you like a site with a guy giving out roofies to girls in clubs then fucking them while they are passed out?

I have the same issue with "drunk sluts" sites, I tend to shy away from them even though the intoxicant is legal. There is no way for me to say "is she just acting, or is she really drunk and doesn't know these two guys are fucking her double anal?"

If you cannot answer the questions by only looking at the images, then it is better you decline the site.

Alex

natalie · 2005-10-27, 05:23 PM

I have had a couple of ones submitted mentioning drugs at a rave and gloryholes and I won't even list that so nope. We don't need illegal stuff on our sites when we are fighting to show whats legal as it is.

juggernaut · 2005-10-28, 12:44 AM

I think you made a good call here Max. Like others had said here the industry has to much shit going on to promote stuff like that. They still have your recip up. I would ask them to take it down. That girl is taking it in the ass, play around with to many bounds these days and you could too.

2005-10-27, 12:34 PM	#1
MadMax "Without evil there can be no good, so it must be good to be evil sometimes" ~ Satan Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Motor City, baby, where carjacking was invented! Now GIMME THOSE SHOES! Posts: 2,385	LL Owners, Would You List... A site that shows the models snorting coke (or at least looking like it) before fucking? I have mixed feelings, looking for opinions.. http://www.getmaxpleasure.com/page06/ass/

2005-10-27, 12:40 PM	#2
JohnnyR I can now put whatever I want in this space :P Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Boobville... I like it way better here Posts: 557	I'm no LL owner so maybe this isn't my place to say, but IMHO coke is definately way worse then sex/porn __________________ With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine!

2005-10-27, 12:44 PM	#3
Surfn If you don’t take a chance the Angels won’t dance Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Earth on occasion Posts: 8,812	I wouldn't list it. __________________ Surfn's Links Are you a partner?

2005-10-27, 12:46 PM	#4
ponygirl on vacation Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 2,095	that's a tough one...I really don't like it personally so that would probably sway my decision. Drugs could imply non-consent as well - it doesn't look like that in these pics but it still bugs me. Plus, coke is a little more illegal than anal sex (in most places I would imagine lol) so... I'd have to say I wouldn't accept sites depicting drug use. Just my personal opinion, it's not a bad site. my little weenie 2 cents Ponygirl __________________ Submit Your Porn I do CSS coding Hosting - JMB Scripts - Tube Site Resources

2005-10-27, 01:05 PM	#6
Preacher There's Xanax in my thurible! Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Wherever they screw on my head Posts: 2,441	Probably not making any fans here, but yes I would. In fact, I have a similiar pic on my site already: Scroll Down! Why? Here's a few reasons. Well I'm more depraved then most. Coke and the porn industry go hand in hand. As far as non-consent, coke isn't like a rufey. I think dead drunk girls is more offensive and I've listed those. I'm not influencing children here, if I am I have other problems. Would you list the site if they were smoking pot instead? BUT, I would not begrudge anyone else for not listing it, nor would I defend my views to the grave. I guess this is just one of the few instances my views go against the grain. __________________ NSCash * This Depraved World

2005-10-27, 12:52 PM	#5
sue-fl You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: May 2005 Location: Florida Posts: 2,837	I agree it's a tough decision. But I wouldn't list it. It's a personal choice for me also which is probably not a good reason to decline it. I don't list sites that I would have to think about the next day should I have listed that or not.

2005-10-27, 01:27 PM	#8
MrYum Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs! Join Date: May 2004 Location: Sunny Florida! Posts: 5,108	Not even a tough decision here, I wouldn't touch a site that depicts anything obviously illegal...coke or pot or whatever. But then, I don't list any of the dead drunk girls stuff either. We've got way more than enough scrutiny these days as it is. Imo, the last thing we need to do is add more fuel to the fire. Making the correlation between consentual adult entertainment and drugs...or girls so drunk that consent is questionable...is the last thing we need to do. __________________ Porno Flixxx Submissions SOTI Site Submissions Free Porn Resource Submissions

2005-10-27, 04:14 PM	#9
MadMax "Without evil there can be no good, so it must be good to be evil sometimes" ~ Satan Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Motor City, baby, where carjacking was invented! Now GIMME THOSE SHOES! Posts: 2,385	I've decided not to list it. Essentially, my POV coincides with Mr Yum's. While I'm personally a big fan of drugs and sex, we're on shaky footing as an industry and I don't see any reason to tempt fate. Thanks for all the input everyone.

2005-10-27, 04:54 PM	#10
RawAlex Took the hint. Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,597	Okay, my 2 cents canadian. Quite simple: A model taking coke is not able to properly give consent to any act that has occured after the point on intoxication. Therefore, the material shows "non consentual sex acts" which is illegal in Canada. For those who want simple words, it is a form of rape. Would you like a site with a guy giving out roofies to girls in clubs then fucking them while they are passed out? I have the same issue with "drunk sluts" sites, I tend to shy away from them even though the intoxicant is legal. There is no way for me to say "is she just acting, or is she really drunk and doesn't know these two guys are fucking her double anal?" If you cannot answer the questions by only looking at the images, then it is better you decline the site. Alex

2005-10-27, 05:23 PM	#11
natalie Whoo! 9/10 the way to buddy plays in "The Christ from Oz"! Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Australia Posts: 921	I have had a couple of ones submitted mentioning drugs at a rave and gloryholes and I won't even list that so nope. We don't need illegal stuff on our sites when we are fighting to show whats legal as it is. __________________ No 2257 woes with Retroraunch Submit to my Punani And my Pink Pussy

2005-10-28, 12:44 AM	#12
juggernaut Registered User Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Central Jersey! If I was rich and powerful I would dress as my avatar does. Posts: 1,448	I think you made a good call here Max. Like others had said here the industry has to much shit going on to promote stuff like that. They still have your recip up. I would ask them to take it down. That girl is taking it in the ass, play around with to many bounds these days and you could too.