five 2257 inspections in Florida with violations

Bill · 2007-09-26, 06:25 PM

"MIAMI, Fla. — The FBI's 2257 inspection team conducted five inspections of Florida-based producers last week, all of which resulted in violations, XBIZ has learned.
Special Agent Chuck Joyner, the head of the FBI’s inspection team, confirmed to XBIZ via email that the inspection team flew to Miami on Sept. 16, and conducted the inspections over the course of that week.

Joyner told XBIZ that all five inspections resulted in violations, but at this time the FBI has no evidence of any minors being included in the content. Joyner said that one producer admitted that he did not keep any photo identification records prior to 2005, and a second producer failed to produce any photo identification records at the time of his inspection. "

http://www.xbiz.com/news/84557

Licker4U · 2007-09-26, 07:33 PM

2257 seems easy to comply with if you're a content producer. If a content producer doesn't take the time to take a photo of a model holding up her drivers license and another approved I.D. and file it away in a file cabinet, he's a dumbass.

Maj. Stress · 2007-09-26, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill

Joyner told XBIZ that all five inspections resulted in violations, but at this time the FBI has no evidence of any minors being included in the content.

Can they honestly say that they expected to find any?

Bill · 2007-09-26, 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Licker4U

2257 seems easy to comply with if you're a content producer. If a content producer doesn't take the time to take a photo of a model holding up her drivers license and another approved I.D. and file it away in a file cabinet, he's a dumbass.

If the record keeping requirements were that simple, this would be much less of an issue.

But the requirements are so complex that I'm pretty much unable to tell you exactly what they are.

They include things like recording all other possible stage names the models have used, in all other productions, everywhere. The FBI complained specifically about this, and charged violations of it, in earlier inspections.

As I understand it, most of the violations in all these inspections have been for these kinds of obscure recordkeeping requirements, and not for anything substantial like the standard ID photo.

No word yet on inspections of secondary producers, altho there was some gossip that some of these last five might be secondaries.

Michael · 2007-09-26, 09:21 PM

How could they shoot models with no id's?

Comeone... have some brain..

Licker4U · 2007-09-27, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael

How could they shoot models with no id's?

Comeone... have some brain..

As Bill mentioned above, I don't think that's the issue...

lassiter · 2007-09-27, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Licker4U

2257 seems easy to comply with if you're a content producer. If a content producer doesn't take the time to take a photo of a model holding up her drivers license and another approved I.D. and file it away in a file cabinet, he's a dumbass.

I thought the content (aka primary) producers also had to keep records of every single 3rd-party URL where the producer's images appear. Virtually impossible if you license your pictures or videos to a large sponsor, who then makes the content available to dozens of affiliate webmasters, and so on....

tickler · 2007-09-27, 01:57 PM

Candid Cams reports on their inspection:
- some IDs that had been faxed to us was illegible
- want current address on our DVDs(Hmmmmmmmmm?????)
- when IDs are required, and not required

http://www.avn.com/index.cfm?objecti...F7ED99859F8626

2007-09-26, 06:25 PM	#1
Bill Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip! Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 3,914	five 2257 inspections in Florida with violations "MIAMI, Fla. — The FBI's 2257 inspection team conducted five inspections of Florida-based producers last week, all of which resulted in violations, XBIZ has learned. Special Agent Chuck Joyner, the head of the FBI’s inspection team, confirmed to XBIZ via email that the inspection team flew to Miami on Sept. 16, and conducted the inspections over the course of that week. Joyner told XBIZ that all five inspections resulted in violations, but at this time the FBI has no evidence of any minors being included in the content. Joyner said that one producer admitted that he did not keep any photo identification records prior to 2005, and a second producer failed to produce any photo identification records at the time of his inspection. " http://www.xbiz.com/news/84557

2007-09-26, 07:33 PM	#2
Licker4U Mean people suck, nice people swallow, are you mean or nice? Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Lower Alabama-The Redneck Riviera Posts: 2,377	2257 seems easy to comply with if you're a content producer. If a content producer doesn't take the time to take a photo of a model holding up her drivers license and another approved I.D. and file it away in a file cabinet, he's a dumbass. __________________ Submit to Girls That Squirt , Hairy Pussy Links and Best Wet Pussy

2007-09-27, 01:57 PM	#8
tickler If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste! Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,177	Candid Cams reports on their inspection: - some IDs that had been faxed to us was illegible - want current address on our DVDs(Hmmmmmmmmm?????) - when IDs are required, and not required http://www.avn.com/index.cfm?objecti...F7ED99859F8626 __________________ Latina Twins, Solo, NN, Hardcore Latin Teen Cash

2007-09-26, 09:21 PM	#5
Michael If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 32	How could they shoot models with no id's? Comeone... have some brain..