Rules against BDSM

nastysurfers · 2004-06-13, 02:06 AM

Today I have seen three link lists that have a new rule against BDSM. Is this fear of the Bushies at work?

PLEASE U.S. webmasters, vote for Kerry in November.

RawAlex · 2004-06-13, 11:42 AM

I am in Canada, and I pretty much am obliged to decline:

Bondage with penetration (non consentual sex act depicted) - you can tie someone up, you can fuck them, but you can't fuck them while they are restrained (and this applied for all penetration sex acts)

Most anything that is degredation... and that can be implied for the title of the site or the actions inside.

It's a pretty fine line, I have webmasters submit sites and I will accept about half of them... some are just over the line, some are just short of the line.

Alex

nastysurfers · 2004-06-13, 01:50 PM

Is that why Findpics blacklisted my domain (nastysurfers.com)? I wrote and asked the reason and got no answer.

I do see that you have a rule against "degradation" but that's in the eye of the beholder.

RawAlex · 2004-06-13, 08:27 PM

Actually, it's in the eye of our legal system here. I don't want to come up on the wrong side of it... even though the Sweet's won their case against the courts, it still set them back a ways and really makes me uninterested in being part of it.

As for your sites in particular, "Hottest nude sluts tied up, drenched in water and nearly drowned in 36 videos." The "nearly drowned" part stopped me. Snuff or near snuff ain't anything I would even bother to look at. I am not 100% clear on the legality of it in my jurisdiction, and when in doubt, I say no.

I also found in general that your sites have too much content (this site had 36 * 21 seconds = over 12 minutes of video). Typically I am looking for about 200 seconds, 20 clips of 10 or 10 clips of 20. For someone into these fantasies, you have provided more than enough material to spank, get off, come back the next day and spank some more.

Alex

nastysurfers · 2004-06-13, 10:27 PM

OK, but why ban my domain? Can't you just reject the site?

I do sites that aren't in the BDSM niche that I could submit.

Opti · 2004-06-14, 05:11 AM

If there is an experienced freesite builder that thinks they understand exactly what Alex is saying and wants a part time job assisting with reviewing sites and editing a large database of existing sites.. please email webmaster@ we love free porn

2004-06-13, 02:06 AM	#1
nastysurfers Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 26	Rules against BDSM Today I have seen three link lists that have a new rule against BDSM. Is this fear of the Bushies at work? PLEASE U.S. webmasters, vote for Kerry in November.

2004-06-13, 11:42 AM	#2
RawAlex Took the hint. Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,597	I am in Canada, and I pretty much am obliged to decline: Bondage with penetration (non consentual sex act depicted) - you can tie someone up, you can fuck them, but you can't fuck them while they are restrained (and this applied for all penetration sex acts) Most anything that is degredation... and that can be implied for the title of the site or the actions inside. It's a pretty fine line, I have webmasters submit sites and I will accept about half of them... some are just over the line, some are just short of the line. Alex

2004-06-13, 01:50 PM	#3
nastysurfers Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 26	Is that why Findpics blacklisted my domain (nastysurfers.com)? I wrote and asked the reason and got no answer. I do see that you have a rule against "degradation" but that's in the eye of the beholder.

2004-06-13, 08:27 PM	#4
RawAlex Took the hint. Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,597	Actually, it's in the eye of our legal system here. I don't want to come up on the wrong side of it... even though the Sweet's won their case against the courts, it still set them back a ways and really makes me uninterested in being part of it. As for your sites in particular, "Hottest nude sluts tied up, drenched in water and nearly drowned in 36 videos." The "nearly drowned" part stopped me. Snuff or near snuff ain't anything I would even bother to look at. I am not 100% clear on the legality of it in my jurisdiction, and when in doubt, I say no. I also found in general that your sites have too much content (this site had 36 * 21 seconds = over 12 minutes of video). Typically I am looking for about 200 seconds, 20 clips of 10 or 10 clips of 20. For someone into these fantasies, you have provided more than enough material to spank, get off, come back the next day and spank some more. Alex

2004-06-13, 10:27 PM	#5
nastysurfers Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 26	OK, but why ban my domain? Can't you just reject the site? I do sites that aren't in the BDSM niche that I could submit.

2004-06-14, 05:11 AM	#6
Opti I Didn't Do It Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: au Posts: 795	If there is an experienced freesite builder that thinks they understand exactly what Alex is saying and wants a part time job assisting with reviewing sites and editing a large database of existing sites.. please email webmaster@ we love free porn