Tell my WHY you would reject this

[SmithsMedia]

http://www.smithsfeet.co.uk/index2.htm

Please ignor the recip links, they will be changed to suite niche etc,

Im just interested to know why this would be rejected. A lot of people have told me toreduce myimage size so I have, this effort has taken me a little longer to make I followed one of VNWR's tutorials.

GG do I have any hope of getting this type of build onto your sites - I have to ask :-)

[Greenguy]

The enter link is tiny compared to the rest of the page & the content seems a bit too mixed.

[grzepa]

Well , for me the only reason besides the probability of content beeing overused (which I doubt) on the second gallery the girl is naked in the first couple of pics and on the last couple of ones she's clothed again... GG just applied a rule about that....
I'd make the galleries represent the natural flow ie: less nakkidness on the first gal , more on the second.

[Useless]

Your galleries contain the bare minimum of thumbs. (10) Each gallery has multiple girls, hence no continuity. The full size pics are 500 on the long edge - again, the bare minimum. There does not appear to be an obvious title to add cohesion from page to page. Plus, you have four outgoing links on each gallery page.

Those could be a few reasons for rejection. I'm just guessing thoough.

[RawAlex]

index2.html will get you rejected in some places.

Alex

[SmithsMedia]

Originally posted by Greenguy
The enter link is tiny compared to the rest of the page & the content seems a bit too mixed.

See this is where things fail to make sense to me GG, I made sites before with bigger images and was advised reduce them as to the minimum of 500 on the logest edge.

Its true there is a mix of content however this reflects the a true reflection of what someone signing up would see. Also Im not here to give content away but provide samples

this is what I want to learn about;
There does not appear to be an obvious title to add cohesion from page to page. Plus, you have four outgoing links on each gallery page.

the additional link is back to my hub, but hey I have to learn and hell the only way is to ask.

now compared to this http://www.smithslookup.co.uk/free_s...anda/index.htm I personally think though please let me know, that the the other site I have mentioned is more in line with what I should be producing.

[Greenguy]

I didn't say anything about the size of them images.

I said that:

1 - "The enter link is tiny compared to the rest of the page" - It looks like pretty much everything else on the page is font size 4, but your "ENTER - LEAVE" links have no font size in the html, so it's taken as the default font size, which is 2 or 3, depending on the browser you're using. When the enter link is a smaller font than the rest of the page, I tend to think you are trying to hide it.

2 - "the content seems a bit too mixed" - the 1st gallery has 6 pics of one girl & 4 of another - you can get away with this one if you moved the 6 to one table & left the 4 in another, but by breaking them up so that 5 of the 6 are in the 1st table, then the remaining pic is with the 4 other ones, it looks "mixed" Gallery 2 is worse, with 3 of one girl, 4 of another & yet 3 of another & again, they are not sorted that well (1st table has 3 of one & 2 of #2 then the 2nd table has the other 3 of #2 & the 3 of the 3rd one)

[Useless]

Nochex,
Ok, I made the statement about the pic sizes. I didn't mean to add to your confusion. I'm just saying, if you give the bare minimum when there is so much competition, you don't look so hot. I'd also advise against going to big. You don't want to give away too much or burn up bandwidth.

Here is my advice. Read the rules over and over at a great many link lists. You'll see that, outside a few personal bans, most of them govern their submissions by the same rules. Then, start reviewing the free sites listed at the link lists you submit to. Get an idea of the quality they are looking for. Note how many recips you see on the warning pages. Note the average amount of thumbs per gallery. Note the thumb sizes. Note the size of full pics. See how easy it is to navigate those sites. Study the hell out of your competition.

BTW, I don't run a link list. I just build free sites.

[Jaden]

The only reason I would reject it at my LL would be for the 4 outgoing links on the gallery pages. Thats the only reason it would get declined with me...

[SmithsMedia]

Ok taken everything on board and made a few changes, the outgoing links will be sorted too as I upload each page.

Sorry GG was not aiming the sizing issue at you - with regard to the mixture of content I have addressed this and used 10 of two models. The bloody sponsor gives you 18 of each, they may as well give me a chocolate tea pot too. ;-)

The next site I am gonna habe a similar problem as the sponsor provides 96 random images, thing is its something different and Im hoping that will help earn me some +'s.

Any how back to grind :-)

[Greenguy]

Originally posted by NochexContact
The next site I am gonna habe a similar problem as the sponsor provides 96 random images....

That's not going to be a problem - the problem is when you ahve them laid out like you did on the last one - with 96 pics from different sets, you'd just have a mix of content on the page, which is not that out of the ordinary

[finnbear]

I'm no reviewer but enter link is small, and gllary links are real small too.

No back links in galleries, but am I right if I say that we don't need them anymore? I always put back link in gallery page, but I have seen many sites in LLs who don't use it and they have been listed.

BTW, why webmasters link their exit link to Yahoo? Those guys have already lots of money and won't pay us a penny for a link. Or if they pay, gongratulations, but I won't link anywhere from my free site where I can't get paid.

You don't even need exit link. They can click back button in their browser if they want out of your warning page.

[SmithsMedia]

Originally posted by finnbear


BTW, why webmasters link their exit link to Yahoo? Those guys have already lots of money and won't pay us a penny for a link. Or if they pay, gongratulations, but I won't link anywhere from my free site where I can't get paid.

well I have a little bit of a love affair with yahoo. I have some notes to add to another thread on this board though just not had a moment to do it.

Thanks for the imput, I have made some changes so one shall see if this works out :-)

I list sites, if Im honest I look only for a return link and a fair level of ads, but the most important thing to me to be fair is the return link.

anyhow back to playing catch up :-)

[finnbear]

I have used no adult links that pay in exit link but as I got no sells I just stopped using the exit link. If they will leave they leave and that's that.

[SmithsMedia]

Thats a fair point, the company I work for - Nochex.com is non adult we dont have an affiliate scheme as of yet though Ive always beleived it would be good for us to get 'leavers' and in return offer a listing in the adult section.

It may have a possitive effect on PR and also at least you get something back.

BTW hi to you in Finland - I have dealings with a companies there

one day I hope to get to Helsinki :-)