Clarification

binxgook · 2005-06-14, 08:58 PM

This may be a dumb ?

So under the new 2257 if the site I build is only nude female stripping is 2257 needed on the actual free site? No hardcore or penetration at all.

Toby · 2005-06-14, 09:33 PM

It depends on which lawyer you ask.

binxgook · 2005-06-14, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toby

It depends on which lawyer you ask.

Greenguy · 2005-06-14, 10:45 PM

It really depends on what the DOJ's definition of "sexually explicit" is (which no one knows)

binxgook · 2005-06-14, 11:02 PM

Well,shit biscuits and country fried fuck this is aggrevating!!!!

Useless · 2005-06-14, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toby

It depends on which lawyer you ask.

That may very well be the most truthful and forthright statement I've seen in all of the 2257 threads.

I think, instead telling people to consult an attorney, we should be telling them to consult several attorneys and their attorneys' attorneys. Me thinks it would be a lot cheaper and just as accurate to sit down for 15 minutes with a palm reader or a proctologist.

RawAlex · 2005-06-14, 11:47 PM

It is one of the weird things about the new 2257 that doesn't make sense. There is a definition of sexual explicit in 2256 that is the "standard". But then in the new 2257 they exclude "E" (genitals) but keep using the term sexually explicit - which as a matter of law has been defined in 2256.

It's stunning how it all goes.

Alex

babymaker · 2005-06-15, 12:27 AM

Well, they say SM/BD is sexually explicit lol

so who the fuck knows most SM people i know are clothed and it has nothing to do with sex WTF do they even know what it is?? What's next sex stories too

i'm tired of 2257 already, can't do shit til someone actually knows what is going on it's getting fustrating!

mist · 2005-06-15, 12:52 AM

Sec. 2256. - Definitions for chapter

(2)

''sexually explicit conduct'' means actual or simulated -

(A)

sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;

(B)

bestiality;

(C)

masturbation;

(D)

sadistic or masochistic abuse; or

(E)

lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

So I wonder if simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals means that you need docs for a fully dressed model spreading her legs...

2005-06-14, 08:58 PM	#1
binxgook My big ole' fat baby loves to eat Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Minnesota Posts: 689	Clarification This may be a dumb ? So under the new 2257 if the site I build is only nude female stripping is 2257 needed on the actual free site? No hardcore or penetration at all.

2005-06-14, 09:33 PM	#2
Toby Lonewolf Internet Sales Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Houston Posts: 4,826	It depends on which lawyer you ask. __________________ Latex Vixens Babes In Boots Well Heeled Women Dressing For Sex Stocking Vixens

2005-06-14, 10:45 PM	#4
Greenguy The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Blasdell, NY (shithole suburb south of Buffalo) Posts: 41,929	It really depends on what the DOJ's definition of "sexually explicit" is (which no one knows) __________________ Promote POV Porn Cash By Building & Submitting Galleries to the Porn Luv Network

2005-06-15, 12:27 AM	#8
babymaker Someone Turn Off The Damn Heat! Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: The Sewer....err.philly i mean Posts: 1,366	Well, they say SM/BD is sexually explicit lol so who the fuck knows most SM people i know are clothed and it has nothing to do with sex WTF do they even know what it is?? What's next sex stories too i'm tired of 2257 already, can't do shit til someone actually knows what is going on it's getting fustrating! __________________ *Get ElevatedX W/Hosting 99MO!*

2005-06-14, 11:02 PM	#5
binxgook My big ole' fat baby loves to eat Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Minnesota Posts: 689	Well,shit biscuits and country fried fuck this is aggrevating!!!!

2005-06-14, 11:47 PM	#7
RawAlex Took the hint. Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,597	It is one of the weird things about the new 2257 that doesn't make sense. There is a definition of sexual explicit in 2256 that is the "standard". But then in the new 2257 they exclude "E" (genitals) but keep using the term sexually explicit - which as a matter of law has been defined in 2256. It's stunning how it all goes. Alex

2005-06-15, 12:52 AM	#9
mist Asleep at the switch? I wasn't asleep, I was drunk Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: EU Posts: 214	Sec. 2256. - Definitions for chapter (2) ''sexually explicit conduct'' means actual or simulated - (A) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; (B) bestiality; (C) masturbation; (D) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or (E) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person; So I wonder if simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals means that you need docs for a fully dressed model spreading her legs...