Getting linked

[sketch]

Hi Folks,

Two sites I've submitted several times (after various corrections) are still not getting linked.

Anyone care to review:

http://amateurlists.com/anal/sites/anal-chicks-fucked/
http://amateurlists.com/anal/sites/blonde-anal-glory/

I can't find anything else wrong with these two sites.

Thanks for your time!
Sketch

[DangerDave]

sketch,

http://amateurlists.com/anal/sites/anal-chicks-fucked/

1 - "Free pics" is not the title of your site.. so why is it at the top?

2 - The first link to Siccash is blind.

That would stop the reviewer in their tracks..

Same for

http://amateurlists.com/anal/sites/blonde-anal-glory/

DD

[sketch]

Hi DD,

Thanks for the feedback. Free Pics should be free pics: title here.

As for the blind link... being relatively new to this I'm looking for the definition of "blind". The leading paragraph clearly states what the surfer will see when they click the link... What is deceptive about this? "Click here for videos", and on the next page they see on topic videos.

I'm lost

Thanks again for your feedback, any assistance would be greatly appreciated!

Sketch

[finnbear]

Well, I'm not LL owner but that link IMHO tells surfers that they see anal sex videos for free.

Sponsor link must be sponsor link and surfers must see that if they click they must join and pay to see the stuff.

I didn't clicked the link but if there is free sample clips you can promote them like "Click Here to see free anal video clips at Anysitename Here". That is not a blind link, I presume.

[sketch]

Hey Finnbear,

That's precisely the message, and it delivers. The next page has several samples clips that depict anal sex, free.

I did heed your advice and specified the site name "See vids of this at Ass Then Mouth". I wouldn't think this is a blind link, but thanks for all the suggestions.

I'll let a couple more people peer over these before I submit them again, no sense in wasting everyones time

Thanks again,
Sketch

[Greenguy]

Also, none of the pages fit on an 800 wide monitor

[MadMax]

DD & GG have pretty much summed it up. Fix those problems and I'd be willing to list the sites. The warning I'll give you is that they're two sites with pretty much exactly the same template, the only differences being some really minor color changes. If I saw both sites submitted at the same time that would make me wary. You give more than the 20 pic minimum, which is good so I might make an exception, but you REALLY need to keep your pages from scrolling horizontally on 800x600. Keep your table widths to 750 and you shouldn't have a problem there.

You really should use different templates if you're submitting multiple sites at the same time, and any template a reviewer sees more than twice in a couple months is likely to start getting bounced for that reason. You've also got some typos in your sales text, which should be corrected, i.e. "vioalted" and "viedos." While this might not give you a problem on its own, it can be the "last nail in the coffin" so to speak.

Clean them up and I'd list them as long as they're going in different categories (i.e. one in Anal and one in Blondes). If you wanted them both in Anal you'd need two different page layouts/sets of colors. HTH.

[sketch]

Originally posted by Greenguy
Also, none of the pages fit on an 800 wide monitor

Thanks, this is now corrected and noted for future reference. My primary browser is Firefox, and that 750 table fit pefect, however in IE there was a 2px horizontal scroll (yuck!).

All fixed now.

[sketch]

Thanks madmax. Spelling errors corrected - that's what happens when your mind moves faster then your fingers and you wear 3 inch glasses!

Thanks for the note about tempaltes, I'm working on other site designs now, these were my third and fourth sites

You guys were all a big help!

Thanks!|afro| |afro| |afro| |afro|

[sketch]

Hrm. Even with all those changes the sites still didn't get listed.

Maybe it's a content/layout thing.

Ah well, try try again

Thanks everyone.