Which LLs accept Custom Recips?

[Magnoody]

If you have a LL that accepts a custom recip or if you know a LL that accepts custom recips plz post here.

All custom recips will be txt only.arial font. +2 font linking to the main page and +1 font linking to the category.



EDITED

And would accept a free site with 30 recips as I don't like duplicating sites.Google hates nothing more than duplicated sites and I get next to no traffic from google.

All recips will be arranged in a table with clean layout and Google will love us all

[Surfn]

Werks for me

[Mateusz]

I got text recip anyway so feel free to just change the font

[HC-Majick]

I'm ok with text recips

[MrYum]

Text only recips are your friend

[Fonz]

I have no problems with text recips either

[ladydesigner]

I'll also take text recips on both my link lists.

[PR_Tom]

That'll be fine on http://www.sexpc.com/

[Magnoody]

great
anymore?

[funsmut]

Text links are welcome at FunSmut.com

[Preacher]

Yes, in fact I encourage it. Makes it look cleaner IMO.

This Depraved World

-Preacher

[Bill]

I like the idea of 20 to 27 recips on a freesite. I've been talking about this a bit privately.

There should be definite advantages to this, both for search engine and traffic reasons, for both the freesite builder and definitely the linklist owner.

This would be far better for both than any form of "doorway", wether the doorway is an individual page or a seperate directory.

The old reasons for rejecting sites with a large number of recips are now largely defunct.

I'd like to see more discussion on this topic.

[Lemmy]

I have nothing against text recips as long as it's nicely done.

[MrYum]

Originally Posted by Bill

I like the idea of 20 to 27 recips on a freesite. I've been talking about this a bit privately.

There should be definite advantages to this, both for search engine and traffic reasons, for both the freesite builder and definitely the linklist owner.

This would be far better for both than any form of "doorway", wether the doorway is an individual page or a seperate directory.

The old reasons for rejecting sites with a large number of recips are now largely defunct.

I'd like to see more discussion on this topic.

Agreed Bill

I've been building 3 distinct sites wrapped around the same content, but with largely different text. Pain in the butt to do, but does enable me to get 3 pseudo mirrors without dup page issues.

Would be great to use as many as 30 or 40 tight text recips on a single page...as long as they look good. And should be much better se wise.

[Useless]

I'm a member of Bill's fan club too.

My only thought on custum recips is that they must be legible. I've seen people build some really crappy recip tables where the text color is barely lighter than the bgcolor. The font can't be too small and there must also be a small amount of breathing room so that each list's link is distinguishable. Otherwise, I just assume see 35 recips rather than only 9.

[Magnoody]

Originally Posted by MrYum

Agreed Bill

I've been building 3 distinct sites wrapped around the same content, but with largely different text. Pain in the butt to do, but does enable me to get 3 pseudo mirrors without dup page issues.

Would be great to use as many as 30 or 40 tight text recips on a single page...as long as they look good. And should be much better se wise.

damn, that's a lot of work man
This is why I started submitting my last few sites to 16 big LL only.

[Magnoody]

Originally Posted by Bill

I like the idea of 20 to 27 recips on a freesite. I've been talking about this a bit privately.

There should be definite advantages to this, both for search engine and traffic reasons, for both the freesite builder and definitely the linklist owner.

This would be far better for both than any form of "doorway", wether the doorway is an individual page or a seperate directory.

The old reasons for rejecting sites with a large number of recips are now largely defunct.

I'd like to see more discussion on this topic.

Imo there's pros and cons for both the fs builder and LL owners.

FS Builders:
Cons:
1-Less LL Traffic:The more LL accept their FS, the more traffic they get.
Pros:
1-Easier to build and submit.
2-easier to build LL recips.
3-Higher Serps >> More productive traffic(less useless traffic = less B/W and better ratios)

LL Owners
Cons:
1-Some LL owners thinks that they will get less traffic if their recip is placed with 30 more.this might be right, BUT the traffic is more productive.
2-It would be harder for the small LL to grow as the submitter will select the bigger LL to submit to.
Pros:
1-You are linking to a unique site, not just a duplicated site under the same domain on the same host(Google hates nothing more than this).And your also getting a link back from a unique site.Higher SERPs

And because of the last two points I thought only the big LL will accept these kind of free sites while the small ones won't.

I'd really like to know the thoughts of LL owners(espicially the big ones) that would reject these FS.

[rscott]

I'm in Cyber Link XXX

Definately easier to maintain

[Jel]

[quote=Magnoody]2-It would be harder for the small LL to grow as the submitter will select the bigger LL to submit to.
Pros:
1-You are linking to a unique site, not just a duplicated site under the same domain on the same host(Google hates nothing more than this).And your also getting a link back from a unique site.Higher SERPs

And because of the last two points I thought only the big LL will accept these kind of free sites while the small ones won't.
[quote]

Both those points are why I accept mirror pages rather than only mirrored directory index pages, and sub to smaller (or big) LLs that accept the same.

[pornhitzman]

No problem! see sig

[RedCherry]

Originally Posted by Magnoody

Imo there's pros and cons for both the fs builder and LL owners.



I'd really like to know the thoughts of LL owners(espicially the big ones) that would reject these FS.

I would MUCH rather be listed with 30 other sites if that was your only doorway, then with just five sites that you never promote that doorway.

And I love text recips, as long as you link to my index page and category page you are submitting to, go for it as far as customizing the links. I do the same thing for the free sites I build.

I don't even care if you change the text slightly (although don't put big fat babes if submitting to secretary porn for instance, keep on topic) because google also loves if you have varying anchor text for links too, so it doesn't look like you are trying to artificially inflate your link pop.

[neveremail]

Originally Posted by Preacher

Yes, in fact I encourage it. Makes it look cleaner IMO.

This Depraved World

-Preacher

Preacher: The background of your site appears white in firefox (on my PC anyway) so you cant read the text. You might wanna look inot that. I'm looking on the submit rules page.

[beano]

Originally Posted by neveremail

Preacher: The background of your site appears white in firefox (on my PC anyway) so you cant read the text. You might wanna look inot that. I'm looking on the submit rules page.

Yup, same here. Your bg is white in my Firefox too. |shocking|

[Preacher]

$&*@^$@(*@$

Damn cross browsing css issues! Thanks for the heads up, I'll fix that ASAP! I'll put in a good word to for both of you!

[M.D]

Text links are my favorite, Check my sig