Freesites and Javascript (js)

wrk4 · 2006-08-29, 07:34 AM

Hello Everyone -

I submitted a fs, which has a small and fast loading js, and it got approved by big and small link list reviewers. However, one reviewer told me that js is a "no go" on fs. I've always used js on my freesites and haven't had any issues. The js is used to only clean up my href info.

I'm trying to improve and I don't want to be accused of cheating or any other nasty allegations. Can you pls tell me if my href js may be a concern for other ll reviewers?

Ex. http://nedsnookie.com/free-sex/milf/hot-milf/

Thanx -

wrk4

kitty_kate · 2006-08-29, 08:46 AM

I'm no rewiewer, but why do you need to hardcode that JS?
What does that JS exactly?

ponygirl · 2006-08-29, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wrk4

Hello Everyone -

I submitted a fs, which has a small and fast loading js, and it got approved by big and small link list reviewers. However, one reviewer told me that js is a "no go" on fs. I've always used js on my freesites and haven't had any issues. The js is used to only clean up my href info.

I'm trying to improve and I don't want to be accused of cheating or any other nasty allegations. Can you pls tell me if my href js may be a concern for other ll reviewers?

Ex. http://nedsnookie.com/free-sex/milf/hot-milf/

Thanx -

wrk4

You will not find many (if any) Link Lists that allow java. If your site was accepted it was because no one has noticed yet.

You can use an onmouseover to change your status bar text as long as it shows the correct destination, and that's what I'd start doing or you'll get blacklisted pretty quick.

hope that helps

Jim · 2006-08-29, 09:02 AM

The whole Java thing is sad. There are so many cool things you can do, much like active-x. And yet, people have learned to cheat with both so they end up being put on the "no good" list.

A sad state of affairs...

wrk4 · 2006-08-29, 10:15 AM

Pony Girl - my script does only and exactly what you stated. Additionally, my sites have been approved in the past and i find it difficult to believe other reviewers have just been careless. Perhaps I've been approved because only my status is affected.

Kitty_Kate - the script is an improved version of your standard/typical "onmouseover" code. By simply adding a title and a class to the tag, I can produce the same result. And by placing the guts of the java at the bottom of the page, the visitor won't notice any delays due to java.

Basically, if normal "onmouseover" code is allowed I would think my code would be allowed as well. However, that's a bit more technical than needed. I guess the appropriate question is....

Is it acceptable to use java onmouseover code to remove your affiliate information if you maintain the linked to site in the status bar?

-wrk4

ponygirl · 2006-08-29, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wrk4

Is it acceptable to use java onmouseover code to remove your affiliate information if you maintain the linked to site in the status bar?

-wrk4

short answer - no

do a search on the board and you'll see. Java is just not acceptable on free sites. See Jim's post - a few ruined it for everyone.

sorry, don't mean to be rude but that's just the way it is.

MrYum · 2006-08-29, 12:36 PM

Yep, it was me that declined your site due to the js.

Onmouseovers are fine and accepted at pretty much all link sites to the best of my knowledge.

As Jim mentioned...js was abused for too long, so now it's a no go at almost all link sites. Don't know what to tell you as to how you've gotten away with it for this long.

Even if your code is simply to hide paysite codes, the reality is reviewers don't have time to analyze your code to confirm that purpose. When I view source on a page and see js...it's an instant decline. That's true of almost all reviewers in todays link list/free site game.

wrk4 · 2006-08-29, 02:49 PM

Kitty_Kate -"No offence wrk4, but it smells fishy to me" - Offense taken!
"Btw, I didn't knew that you need..." - It's not about what you know. And the key word is need. And no I don't but I find this more efficient.

"I haven't seen until now JS doing this simple thing and being hardcoded that much" - What can I say to that without being mean... You haven't seen it, fine. If you'd like to learn feel free to poke around cssbeauty.com or stylegala.com and look for jquery.

Hello PonyGirl - Thanks for the input. But I keep reading contradicting answers to this question. You said no but then cool Mr. Yum said yes.

What's up MrYum.

I know you're the one that declined me I just didn't want to throw your name out there. A friend of mine, who has a ll, adviced me to take it to the board to get a consensus opinion. As you can see it isn't going so well. Although disappointed, I understand your position.

kitty_kate · 2006-08-29, 10:51 AM

No offence wrk4, but it smells fishy to me.
I haven't seen until now JS doing this simple thing and being hardcoded that much.

Btw, I didn't knew that you need AJAX to make a bloody mouse over. (ajaxHandles XMLHttpRequest textarea keypress keydown file password image button checkbox radio - nice strings in your code)

2006-08-29, 07:34 AM	#1
wrk4 A woman is like beer. They look good, they smell good, and you'd step over your own mother just to get one! Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 56	Freesites and Javascript (js) Hello Everyone - I submitted a fs, which has a small and fast loading js, and it got approved by big and small link list reviewers. However, one reviewer told me that js is a "no go" on fs. I've always used js on my freesites and haven't had any issues. The js is used to only clean up my href info. I'm trying to improve and I don't want to be accused of cheating or any other nasty allegations. Can you pls tell me if my href js may be a concern for other ll reviewers? Ex. http://nedsnookie.com/free-sex/milf/hot-milf/ Thanx - wrk4

2006-08-29, 08:46 AM	#2
kitty_kate Well you know boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like women. You just have to read the manual and press the right button Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: The Colloseum Posts: 155	I'm no rewiewer, but why do you need to hardcode that JS? What does that JS exactly? __________________ My Asian Kitty - My Free Sites

2006-08-29, 10:15 AM	#5
wrk4 A woman is like beer. They look good, they smell good, and you'd step over your own mother just to get one! Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 56	Pony Girl - my script does only and exactly what you stated. Additionally, my sites have been approved in the past and i find it difficult to believe other reviewers have just been careless. Perhaps I've been approved because only my status is affected. Kitty_Kate - the script is an improved version of your standard/typical "onmouseover" code. By simply adding a title and a class to the tag, I can produce the same result. And by placing the guts of the java at the bottom of the page, the visitor won't notice any delays due to java. Basically, if normal "onmouseover" code is allowed I would think my code would be allowed as well. However, that's a bit more technical than needed. I guess the appropriate question is.... Is it acceptable to use java onmouseover code to remove your affiliate information if you maintain the linked to site in the status bar? -wrk4 Last edited by wrk4; 2006-08-29 at 10:47 AM..

2006-08-29, 12:36 PM	#7
MrYum Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs! Join Date: May 2004 Location: Sunny Florida! Posts: 5,108	Yep, it was me that declined your site due to the js. Onmouseovers are fine and accepted at pretty much all link sites to the best of my knowledge. As Jim mentioned...js was abused for too long, so now it's a no go at almost all link sites. Don't know what to tell you as to how you've gotten away with it for this long. Even if your code is simply to hide paysite codes, the reality is reviewers don't have time to analyze your code to confirm that purpose. When I view source on a page and see js...it's an instant decline. That's true of almost all reviewers in todays link list/free site game. __________________ Porno Flixxx Submissions SOTI Site Submissions Free Porn Resource Submissions

2006-08-29, 02:49 PM	#8
wrk4 A woman is like beer. They look good, they smell good, and you'd step over your own mother just to get one! Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 56	Kitty_Kate -"No offence wrk4, but it smells fishy to me" - Offense taken! "Btw, I didn't knew that you need..." - It's not about what you know. And the key word is need. And no I don't but I find this more efficient. "I haven't seen until now JS doing this simple thing and being hardcoded that much" - What can I say to that without being mean... You haven't seen it, fine. If you'd like to learn feel free to poke around cssbeauty.com or stylegala.com and look for jquery. Hello PonyGirl - Thanks for the input. But I keep reading contradicting answers to this question. You said no but then cool Mr. Yum said yes. What's up MrYum. I know you're the one that declined me I just didn't want to throw your name out there. A friend of mine, who has a ll, adviced me to take it to the board to get a consensus opinion. As you can see it isn't going so well. Although disappointed, I understand your position. Last edited by wrk4; 2006-08-29 at 02:56 PM..

2006-08-29, 09:02 AM	#4
Jim Banned Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mohawk, New York Posts: 19,477	The whole Java thing is sad. There are so many cool things you can do, much like active-x. And yet, people have learned to cheat with both so they end up being put on the "no good" list. A sad state of affairs...

2006-08-29, 10:51 AM	#9
kitty_kate Well you know boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like women. You just have to read the manual and press the right button Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: The Colloseum Posts: 155	No offence wrk4, but it smells fishy to me. I haven't seen until now JS doing this simple thing and being hardcoded that much. Btw, I didn't knew that you need AJAX to make a bloody mouse over. (ajaxHandles XMLHttpRequest textarea keypress keydown file password image button checkbox radio - nice strings in your code) __________________ My Asian Kitty - My Free Sites