question for GG, XXXJay, and others

[pornrex]

Hi Guys ,

Last week I mentioned to you that I had the sneaky suspicion that I had been blacklisted, or the very least, not listed by a number of linklists because of my hosting problem. As it turns out, some adult webmasters have told me that I had been blacklisted because of dns errors, even though I post that I was experiencing problems here PRIOR to any of you knowing about it.

I do perform random checks of links submitted and I have noticed that a few have not been listed at the LOR.

Here they are:

1. http://www.teens-4-cash.com/free/teens-4-cash-amateur/
2. http://www.real-milf-gang-bang.com/f...ilf-gang-bang/

The first one - I can see why you or one of your crew may have rejected it because of over submission but I paid for the content.
The second one is strange though. Its a new site with new content, new everything. Perhaps the submission didn't get through or soemthing else.

Please let me know what you found wrong THIS time. I do try to stay within the rules of everyone I submit to - I REALLY do.

Thanks In Advance.

[MrMaryLou]

Well on this one http://www.teens-4-cash.com/free/teens-4-cash-amateur/ I didnt get pass the 1st gallery lack of nudity and the other I didnt review but its vid caps so thats the reason. Also I dont see either domain on the black list

[Linkster]

pornrex - after you sent me that last night - I looked and that was the same reason here - the vid caps - and being sponsor content

[pornrex]

I don't think I will ever understand this vid cap thing...

Can you guys give me a link to site that Doesn't feature vidcaps?

[Greenguy]

Well, the whole vid cap thing is based on the fact that most of them are crappy as far as the quality. Press pause on your VCR or DVD & then look at the TV - this is bascially the same as a vid cap.

The best way around it is to buy content that's not vid caps & was taken by an actual camera.

PS - no one that I know of blacklists for DNS errors, but everyone pretty much removes the links if the host is down.

[Maxline]

GG your rule is:
25. No more CRAPPY vid caps for your pics - video camera's take movies, not still images.

These pics are rather quality (they are not CRAPPY)
- No motion blur,
- No moire
- No distortion

[Greenguy]

If I or my reviewers look at the image & see that it's a vid cap, the site will be declined.

I really don't know how to make this any clearer.

[stev0]

Originally posted by Greenguy
If I or my reviewers look at the image & see that it's a vid cap, the site will be declined.

I really don't know how to make this any clearer.

ah... I misunderstood this too.

I thought you meant no "crappy" vid caps, not no vid caps in general.

[stev0]

Would high quality screen caps be ok?

I wouldn't be trying to mislead anyone, but if you can't tell that it's a screen cap... I don't see the harm.

http://www.picz.ca/free/public_expos...os/photo02.jpg
http://www.picz.ca/free/public_expos...os/photo26.jpg

I just wonder because I recently bought a few thousand dollars worth of DVD licenses hoping to use them for taking screen caps and promoting with free sites / avs sites. But it seems everyone is getting anti-screen cap these days.

[koolkat]

Originally posted by stev0
Would high quality screen caps be ok?

I wouldn't be trying to mislead anyone, but if you can't tell that it's a screen cap... I don't see the harm.

http://www.picz.ca/free/public_expos...os/photo02.jpg
http://www.picz.ca/free/public_expos...os/photo26.jpg

I just wonder because I recently bought a few thousand dollars worth of DVD licenses hoping to use them for taking screen caps and promoting with free sites / avs sites. But it seems everyone is getting anti-screen cap these days.

You can still look at those and tell they are video captures. Maybe if the image was sharpened in something like Photoshop, then you might not be able to tell, but if you look at most video captures, they have a blurriness to them. There really is a HUGE difference in the quality!