Blacklisted without reason.

[Braindead]

I posted this appeal on the 8th March 2007. To date I have received no response at all, I would ask the webmaster for at least a reason for my continued blacklisting.

Pornwaters.com
ghgroup@fsmail.net
Dear Webmaster,
I am sorry to have caused a waste of your time looking at free sites I have submitted in the past that did not reach the required standard. I have been studying many free sites to learn and improve my own work and hope I have gained some experience to avoid the same mistakes in the future.
In light of my efforts to improve and save you unnecessary work I ask you to accept my apology and remove my domain name and email address from the blacklist.
Yours sincerely
Dermot Meehan.
aka braindead.

http://bl.usefulscripts.com/
Type Status Blocked Item
Domain
Active
pornwaters.com appeal
Reason: repeated poor grammar or spelling errors

I posted the above on the appropriate page on 16th March 2007. Again I have had no response. The who, I know, the why I do not know, for being on this blacklist but it seems I am to remain unfairly ostracized from some lists: that is your privilege sir.
I ask ‘link list’ owners to review the two free sites below and point out my errors; in particular in the disciplines of spelling and grammar.
http://pornwaters.com/bi021.index/
http://pornwaters.com/pw21.index/
If any ‘link list’ owners would be willing to accept these and other free sites from me please contact me at the above email address.
Thank you.

[Jim]

I am not really a big fan of poor grammar blacklisting but, I can see how it would happen if sites with poor grammar were submitted after warning.

So, looking at your first site.

Who ever said Bisex was easy?
Not "Three Pillows" that's for sure.
As they all fight like cat and dog
(Should be "Cats and Dogs")
(bitch and vixen?)
(Are you asking a question? This part shouldn't even be there)
to be in
among the sex action,
(Should be, "to be in the sex action.")
who wants to do paperwork when
there's fucking to be done.
(The who should be "Who" and instead of a period at the end, you want a question mark)
Take Suck a Dick Suzy here, her day job at "Three Pillows" is
paper clip counter in accounts! Larry & Harry are qualified
pencil sharper technicians.
(This should be, "Take Suck a Dick Suzy here. Her day job at "Three Pillows" is paper clip counter in accounts. Larry & Harry are qualified pencil sharpener technicians.")

Bisex is not even a word.

It goes on and on with grammatical errors. That was just the first part of the first site.

[LowryBigwood]

I don't know what your native language is, but this tool might create some text that makes sense. http://www.google.com/language_tools?hl=en

[Mr Spock]

Even when Jim corrected your spelling/grammar, I still didn't understand what you were saying? Frankly if you can't write decent English you will not make any sales in an English market.

Whoever put you on the blacklist probably did you a favor, although I am not a fan of blacklists myself.

[Braindead]

Your critique of a few words of grammatical rubbish is I am bound to say, rubbish.
Your first criticism has missed the grammatical error: ‘As they all fight like cat and dog’. In a descriptive narrative, it would be correct to describe who is fighting whom.
You call into question: cat and dog, a descriptive phrase in common usage has no part or meaning in a strict grammatical narrative sense. Therefore, your supposed statement of correct usage of a common phrase is wrong; you may state a personal preference, which is not as you infer in your comment. On a personal note, in reply I would maintain I have heard, read and used the term: fight like cat and dog. If it were possible to use your preferred term of common usage: cats and dogs, it would be incorrect to use the plural and instead English grammar would insist on the collective noun. I have no idea what the collective noun of domestic cats might be and cannot be bothered looking it up. The bracketed ‘bitch and vixen?’ I am asking the reader, we assume the majority of whom to be gay, - “gay” another term in common usage that has no grammatical meaning or influence other than to be happy, (of good spirit?) – If the term would be more suitable than ‘cat and dog’, I am amazed by your lack of knowledge of “gay” parlance.
In descriptive narrative, the same principle applies to verse. Written in the third person singular there is an acronym. P.I.T.H. ‘Pictures in the head’. In the passage:
‘in among the sex action’. The inclusion or exclusion of the word ‘among’ forms the basis of a discussion on semantics. It is your opinion that the word should be excluded; in the context of a textbook or factual description I would whole-heartedly (another superfluous indicative) agree. In the context in which it is used the only grammatical debate I conducted with myself (another highly doubtful word) was over the use of “among” or “amongst”. On reflection I think I made a descriptive error and should have instead used “amongst”.
The passage of words you correct of grammatical and punctuation errors are in any linguistic discipline a total mess. I would argue the passage I wrote is uncorrectable; your inclusion of full stops – the word “period” has many meanings, but none that I am aware of in English punctuation – makes matters worse, in my view. In a true grammatical analysis, the entire piece would have to be scrapped as gibberish.
“The word ‘Bisex’ does not exist”. I have no idea so I accept you are correct. I have to say “O’rama” does not spring off the page in the O.E.D. It is a good word though.
How do you overcome your hostility towards poor spelling & grammar when you see “cum in here”? I could not begin to guess in how many free porn sites that little gem appears. “Goo covered Collage cum sluts”. How does that score on your self-invented scale of acceptable English spelling & grammar?
My understanding of English grammar is I admit appalling for someone born and bred in the 51st State. The words I write for my free sites rip apart the English language miserably, but for what they are, I think a fair comment would be they are in the lower half of not bad. Some sites I have seen are the work of true artists of the written word. Some are so bad as to be illegible.
The only reason for your intense dislike of me has to be purely personal. I have never been anything but polite; I refer you to my appeal. We have never met; I cannot amount to a grain of sand in the Sahara in any capacity with reference to you.
You seem to have your boot firmly on the throat of the business and able to do much as you wish. Remember the words of one of your enlightened Presidents. “Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely”.
You are not a professor of English or a man of letters: if it is your desire to learn a good place to start I suggest is the construction of the sonnet. If your brain is in one piece after that, you have a good chance with the rest.
Thank you to those that have supported me and I understand (no I don’t) if you no longer wish to do so
Yours blah, blah
Mr Spock, how right you are, the money has clearly been mis-directed.

[Greenguy]

Here's the long & shot of it: I blacklisted you because I got tired of seeing your poor grammar. You appealed & gave examples, which also contained poor grammar, so I decided to keep the blacklisting in place.

You are only blacklisted from submitting to me - no one else.

So cross me off your list & move on.

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Braindead

You are not a professor of English or a man of letters: if it is your desire to learn a good place to start I suggest is the construction of the sonnet. If your brain is in one piece after that, you have a good chance with the rest.
Thank you to those that have supported me and I understand (no I don’t) if you no longer wish to do so
Yours blah, blah

Your punctuation, or lack thereof, is also quite abominable. I love how you make some sort of pedantic attempt at displaying your scholarliness, while coming off as a complete fucking idiot. Bravo.

[jonnydoe]

Damn UW I had to look pedantic up...I'm impressed ;-)

[Useless]

Originally Posted by jonnydoe

Damn UW I had to look pedantic up...I'm impressed ;-)

Phew! I thought you were going to say something about the screaming redundancy in pedantic attempt at displaying your scholarliness.

[Jim]

Damn, I didn't even notice that was directed at me after doing as Braindead asked.

And I am one of the few people that doesn't like blacklisting for grammer.

[Linkster]

I just saw this - where the fuck is the 51st state? As far as I remember the last state was the 50th (Hawaii) that was annexed when I was 5 years old - did I miss a big celebration somewhere?

[jonnydoe]

Originally Posted by Linkster

where the fuck is the 51st state?

Puerto Rico was supposed to be but they didn't want any part of us ;-)

[SheepGuy]

Originally Posted by Linkster

I just saw this - where the fuck is the 51st state? As far as I remember the last state was the 50th (Hawaii) that was annexed when I was 5 years old - did I miss a big celebration somewhere?

Some morons refer to Canada as the 51st state. Usually they are American morons, but Canada has it's share of morons as well, including our Prime Minister, who has wet dreams of Canada being the 51st state.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by SheepGuy

Some morons refer to Canada as the 51st state. Usually they are American morons, but Canada has it's share of morons as well, including our Prime Minister, who has wet dreams of Canada being the 51st state.

You're misinformed - we call you America Junior

[Kinky]

Originally Posted by Jim

Damn, I didn't even notice that was directed at me after doing as Braindead asked.

And I am one of the few people that doesn't like blacklisting for grammer.

I was thinking the same thing Jim, I guess you are the dick for tryin' to help |confused|

[Trev]

Originally Posted by Kinky Jones

I was thinking the same thing Jim, I guess you are the dick for tryin' to help |confused|

Nah... It's Greenie AND Jim... therefor they must think (and post) as one. After all... we know they never disagree........