2257 regs published in full

[Barron]

Originally Posted by RawAlex

Pervy, that is why the requirements from some TGPs and link sites for there to be a 2257 disclosure on every gallery or free site is overkill. Even the DOJ knows how to get to the root of a domain.

Alex

I completely and totally dis-agree.

Read this part again:

(d) A computer site or service or Web address containing a
digitally- or computer-manipulated image, digital image, or picture,
shall contain the required statement on its homepage, any known major
entry points, or principal URL (including the principal URL of a
subdomain), or in a separate window that opens upon the viewer's
clicking a hypertext link that states, ``18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping
Requirements Compliance Statement.''

What Pervy posted was commentary, it gave an "example" of and was commenting soley on what they view as subdomain.

But, the reg plainly says "any known major entry point".

If you submit a free site to a link list, you are saying "This is the entry point".

This next part is a veery big stretch, but plausible. When you do a search in any search engine, the results are not retricted to the root of the domain. The url/s listed in the search engine results could be seen as "known entry points".

Yes, this is "the sky is falling" type of reasoning. But, I'm covering my ass just in case I get a pissy investigator looking at my domain.

Rawalex, I'm not sure what they do in Canada, but here in the US, a driver will get pulled over for having a tail light out. The express purpose is to check you for a DWI. Law enforcement here will fuck you if you give them the chance. They are devious fucks that will pull obscure laws out of their hat if they have a mind to. This is not saying they will when it comes to 2257 inspections, but I do believe they might.


-