|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#11 | ||
If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,177
|
Quote:
http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Jdb-txt/...05BCSC0446.htm It's actual court stuff, so a long read, and a lot to try digesting. Make your own conclusions. Quote:
Paul, I can't find the actual article at the moment, but, it really doesn't really matter 1,2,3...pieces of ID. What I was getting at is under Sec. 75.2 Maintenance of records a)2) "Producers may rely in good faith on representations by performers regarding accuracy of the names" and I assume IDs. Paul, also some reading for you: http://www.avn.com/index.php?Primary...tent_ID=228409 Maybe they are trying to leave the back door open by requiring a US issued ID. amber438: Sec. 75.4 If the producer ceases to carry on the business, the records shall be maintained for five years thereafter. Even if they have gone out of business, they are still required to maintain records for 5 years. So hopefully you can still retrieve some of the info. RedCherry: Just removing the pics might not be enough. This wording (including but not limited to Internet computer site or services) has me thinking that if you just have the content. it must be documented also. One thing that does PO about this is that I 90% of the time only use softcore content and hold back the hardcore for maybe a future paysite. But, because the set(s) have hardcore in them, I still need to go through the BS. A question for maybe Alex. Any takes on this wording from 75.8(d) "any known major entry points". Found a side-by-each comparison of the old vs. proposed vs. actual 2257 here: http://my.execpc.com/~xxxlaw/2257Tables5.24.05.htm |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|