|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#11 |
Took the hint.
|
Gonzo, while agree with on most of your points taken on an individual case basis, the reality is a "whole ball of wax". In this ball of wax is a girl doing extreme bondage, soliciting for clients (for acts that most straight people would feel are at least somewhat sexual in nature, hence the revealing constumes, nudity, and the like), and a webmaster program that sends traffic into the mix from porn sites.
Nothing can be taken without context, and the context says "this is a porn site where the girl solicites for clients at $300 an hour, and then requires they are donations not fees". If this was above board, she would take the $300 as a hourly rate and not play games. By playing the old hooker game "it's not a price for sex, it's a donation to show appreciation for me", she puts herself in the same game. Her traffic comes from porn. She acts like a hooker. She operates a "sexual" business receiving clients in a residential neighborhood. When she gets caught, she doesn't run to the S&M people for support, but tries to claim "porn webmaster" and tries to get the support of our industry. Except for a webmaster program that cuts the webmasters out of the most profitable part of the business (the donations) she has little or nothing to do with our industry. Oh yeah, while canaries are good, enough dead canaries can really stink a place up... especially when you didn't put them there to start with. Alex |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|