Why not .KID instead of .XXX?

Wazza · 2005-12-09, 07:33 AM

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.2417:

I think Moby makes a good point - this issue is definately worth revisiting

http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...58&postcount=4

I'm sure with such a levy on all "other" domains you could put together a pretty good panel to review the content

Further - I think you could have a series of .u domains - .u18, .u17 and so on - and a compatible browser which only allows access to the appropriate extension

kidsfundomain might have a u16 domain and a u10 domain - each with content deemed appropriate by this panel

With proper administration this could work quite well...

2005-12-09, 07:33 AM	#11
Wazza I'm a jaded evil bastard, I wouldn't piss on myself if I was on fire... Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 808	http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.2417: I think Moby makes a good point - this issue is definately worth revisiting http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...58&postcount=4 I'm sure with such a levy on all "other" domains you could put together a pretty good panel to review the content Further - I think you could have a series of .u domains - .u18, .u17 and so on - and a compatible browser which only allows access to the appropriate extension kidsfundomain might have a u16 domain and a u10 domain - each with content deemed appropriate by this panel With proper administration this could work quite well... __________________ I sale Internet My sites have no traffic and no PR - let's trade - PM me