|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#9 |
Greenguy & Jim's Unofficial Board Lawyer
|
Great news--
"Secondary Producers" ARE OFF THE HOOK!!! ![]() for the time being...... Trouble is looming, though, because I have heard rumblings that some do-gooders are working in Congress to change the statute to include secondary producers. This ruling will only encourage them. The biggest FSC argument was that only Congress could re-define producers to include webmasters, not the Attorney General. So, we could win the court case but then have Congress change the statute and be fucked all over again. ![]() HOWEVER< The Straight Forward Legal-Trained Answer to your Question is: YES! Secondary Producers are relieved of the record keeping burden! ![]() Hell, I forgot to charge ya'll. I may lose my law license if I keep giving straight answers for no money. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|