Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > Chit Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 2006-04-21, 01:31 PM   #5
RawAlex
Took the hint.
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,597
Send a message via AIM to RawAlex
Boogie, I agree. The trick for us is to find a way to now drive a huge wedge between 2257 and child porn, showing that 2257 clear up the issues of "slightly underage models", and it isn't the same as daddy fucking his 5 year old daughter on a webcam.

2557 is a rule for legit businesses to make legit porn. Nobody stopped making CP because of 2257 - but technically it does because it obliges us to check to make sure models are old enough. It won't stop the type of digusting child abuse that is out there, and making that point in the public forum and in the media is to me a key way that the porn industry can put some distance between itself and the clearly and obviously illegal CP mongers.

There is a chance here to seperate the two - we should exploit it!

Alex
RawAlex is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 PM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc