federal felony for Webmasters to use innocent words like "Barbie" or "Furby"

Jel · 2006-07-29, 12:52 AM

Not sure what kids being killed by porn has to do with anything.

If my 10 year old daughter is searching for barbie on google (and no, I wouldn't let her anywhere near the internet unsupervised, but that's a whole other argument) and up pops 'Lanny Barbie Fucks A Certain Clueless Cunt In The ass With A Strapon' as the title of one of the results, with the captured text along the lines of 'porn superstar lannie barbie dons a lethal strapon and tears into the webmasters most revered assclown's asshole....' then I'd be shocked as fuck if she felt like clicking on it. No intent to mislead there at all.

If the title was 'Barbie, Barbie Do*ls, Barbie T*ys' and the text was some spammy shit like gets pulled, with no indication of it going to a pornsite until you click the link and get redirected to porn, or porn on an innocent sounding domain, then yeah, 50 years is good for me.

I do see your arguments that it's all too easy for Bush & Co to bend the rules to interpret things in their own way, which is more an argument against Bush & Co than an argument about the proposed law imho.

2006-07-29, 12:52 AM	#23
Jel I'm the only guy in the world who has to wake up to have a nightmare Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: London, United Kingdom Posts: 1,895	Not sure what kids being killed by porn has to do with anything. If my 10 year old daughter is searching for barbie on google (and no, I wouldn't let her anywhere near the internet unsupervised, but that's a whole other argument) and up pops 'Lanny Barbie Fucks A Certain Clueless Cunt In The ass With A Strapon' as the title of one of the results, with the captured text along the lines of 'porn superstar lannie barbie dons a lethal strapon and tears into the webmasters most revered assclown's asshole....' then I'd be shocked as fuck if she felt like clicking on it. No intent to mislead there at all. If the title was 'Barbie, Barbie Dols, Barbie Tys' and the text was some spammy shit like gets pulled, with no indication of it going to a pornsite until you click the link and get redirected to porn, or porn on an innocent sounding domain, then yeah, 50 years is good for me. I do see your arguments that it's all too easy for Bush & Co to bend the rules to interpret things in their own way, which is more an argument against Bush & Co than an argument about the proposed law imho.