Wtf!!!!!

[SmithsMedia]

Originally posted by DangerDave
I would have rejected both of them.. !

http://www.smithslookup.co.uk/inbedw...aith/index.htm - that whole site is just about blind.!

and this one - http://www.escortlookup.co.uk/realpunting/index.htm - aint much better.

Both sites speak in terms of our-this and our-that.. which makes most of you links deceptive.

"Click here now to see the video's of 'Real Escort Sex'" - is a deceptive and blind link...

all you have to to do is put

"Click here now to see the video's AT 'Real Escort Sex'" - and it makes it far more acceptable.

Dont come crying here when you get rejected..
Look at your sites
Adjust your practices
Get back to work.


No I aint trying to be "narky!" its a fact... you are at the mercy of reviewers..

DD

You post kind of makers sense then does not in the same breath,

'Both sites speak in terms of our-this and our-that.. which makes most of you links deceptive.'

you have to be kidding me right? time for me to be be frank, what you worte is bollocks to be honest, a blind link is one that says one thing and sends you else where.

If you click on the link you see free videos, I know this as the sponsor added one prior to me making this site.

As for the faith site being blind, you have got to be kidding you have to be fucking stupid not to figure out whats what on that page.

I aint been narky Im being frank, this is a massive topic of WM's re LL owners and their 'rules' I too have a LL and list everything, why? coz some guy has sat their and made it thats why.

I very rarely rant on the boards and I sent the this thread to the LL owner as I want to be as open as possible. The simple solution is not for me to adjust but to find LL and WM who use an element of comman sense when reviewing (Im not sayin you guys dont) as its comman sense that really seems to be lacking on the internet.